The Power of Pixels - The Strategic Convergence of Esports, Unmanned Warfare, and Modern Military Development

I. Executive Summary (TL;DR)

The convergence of esports, unmanned systems, and military strategy is no longer a fringe phenomenon but a core pillar in the development of 21st-century armed forces. This report provides an in-depth analysis of how cognitive skills cultivated through gaming are being systematically applied to remote warfare, how commercial gaming technology is revolutionizing military training paradigms, and how the divergent paths taken by major world powers in applying these trends are creating new strategic asymmetries.

Key Findings:

Recruitment: The U.S. military branches have institutionalized esports as a primary public relations and recruitment channel to connect with a disconnected, tech-savvy youth generation, albeit with significant ethical controversy.
Training Paradigms: The reliance on expensive, bespoke military simulators is being supplanted by cost-effective, scalable, and hyper-realistic training environments built on commercial game engines like Unreal Engine and Unity. This not only accelerates skill acquisition but also enables complex, joint-domain exercises.
Combat Operations: The cognitive profile of elite esports players—including faster reaction times, superior spatial awareness, and decision-making under pressure—is now recognized as an ideal skillset for unmanned systems operators, creating a direct pipeline from gamer to drone operator.
Geopolitical Divergence: Nations are pursuing divergent paths in this domain. The United States leverages its dominant “military-entertainment-technology complex”; China focuses on large-scale, integrated synthetic training for joint operations; and Russia applies gamification for asymmetric purposes, including propaganda and specialized training in areas like electronic warfare.
Ethical Frontiers: The “gamification of war” raises profound ethical questions concerning desensitization to violence, moral disengagement in remote operations, and the societal impact of blurring the lines between entertainment and lethal action.

II. The New Digital Proving Ground: The Convergence of Gaming and Warfare

Historical Context

The relationship between the military and gaming has a long history, evolving from early wargames and rudimentary simulators to the modern “military-entertainment complex”.¹ What began as a partnership of convenience for public relations and training has transformed into a strategic necessity, driven by the technological demands of modern warfare.¹

The Paradigm Shift

The central thesis of this report is that the rise of unmanned and remote warfare has fundamentally altered the skill requirements for the modern combatant. For a growing number of critical roles, this shift prioritizes cognitive and perceptual abilities over traditional physical prowess, making the gaming community a vital reservoir of human capital.⁴ The nature of war is shifting from a physical contest to a cognitive one, and esports serves as a crucible for forging the core competencies required for this future battlefield.⁶

Defining the Scope

This report will systematically deconstruct this convergence across the dimensions of recruitment, cognitive science, training technology, operational psychology, geopolitical comparison, and ethics to reveal its profound impact on national military development.

III. From Pixels to Personnel: Esports as a Strategic Recruitment and Public Relations Medium

Strategic Imperative: Addressing a Recruiting Crisis

The U.S. military, particularly the Army, faced a significant recruiting shortfall in 2018, failing to meet its goal for the first time in 13 years.⁷ In response, it turned to esports. This move was designed to bridge a growing societal disconnect and reach a tech-savvy youth demographic that congregates in digital spaces like online gaming platforms.⁹ Military leaders recognized that gaming could help them connect with young people and show a different side of soldiers, making the military seem more relatable.⁹

Strategic Analysis of U.S. Military Branches

Each branch of the U.S. military has established official esports teams, but their strategic focus and operational models differ, reflecting their unique challenges in recruitment and public image.

U.S. Army: A pioneer in this space, the Army established the U.S. Army Esports (USAE) team in 2018 as a Department of the Army-sanctioned outreach program under the Army Recruiting Command.⁷ Its explicit mission is to “connect America to its Army” through soldiers’ passion for gaming ¹¹, making soldiers more relatable and visible.⁹ The team fields competitive squads in popular first-person shooter (FPS), multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA), and fighting games like
Call of Duty, League of Legends, and Valorant.⁷
U.S. Navy: The Navy’s team, “Goats & Glory,” positions itself as the “‘Blue Angels’ of esports”.⁸ The Navy dedicates a significant portion of its marketing budget (up to $4.3 million in FY2023) to its esports program, with a focus on attracting potential recruits interested in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields.⁸ Their outreach includes hosting large amateur tournaments and engaging with youth at various events.⁸
U.S. Air Force & Space Force: “Air Force Gaming” began as a grassroots initiative to promote resilience, mental acuity, and connection among Airmen and Guardians through gaming.¹² It has since evolved into a major competitive hub, hosting global tournaments and providing resources for local bases to run their own gaming events through its “Base Support Program”.¹²

This investment in esports is more than a public relations tactic; it reflects a deeper human capital strategy. The stated mission of these teams is public relations and outreach, aimed at improving the military’s image and connecting with youth.⁹ However, the selection criteria are stringent: members must be active duty, reserve, or National Guard soldiers in good standing with no disciplinary issues, and they must be “experts in their respective game,” able to compete at the “highest levels of esports competition”.¹¹ Simultaneously, research sponsored by military bodies like the Office of Naval Research explicitly identifies gamers as having superior cognitive abilities that are directly transferable to high-demand roles like pilots and surgeons.⁶

Connecting these threads reveals a dual-purpose human capital strategy. While serving as a PR tool, the esports teams also function as an internal talent identification and vetting mechanism. It creates a centralized, observable pool of soldiers who have already demonstrated high-level cognitive skills, performance under pressure, and teamwork—the very traits in high demand for technologically advanced roles like drone operators. The esports programs thus perform a sophisticated human capital management function under the guise of public relations.

Controversies and Ethical Boundaries in Digital Recruiting

The military’s foray onto streaming platforms like Twitch has not been without significant controversy.

The Army’s Twitch channel was accused of violating the First Amendment by banning users who discussed U.S. war crimes in the chat.⁷
The channel was also criticized for running fake giveaways, where links promising a gaming controller redirected users to a recruitment form, a practice that eventually drew intervention from Twitch.⁷
These incidents led to legislative backlash, with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attempting to pass a bill to ban military recruitment on streaming platforms, though it ultimately failed.⁷
Critics argue that using video games to promote the military is unethical, as it “gamifies war” and targets teenagers, potentially trivializing the harsh realities of actual combat.⁸ Notably, the U.S. Marine Corps has so far refused to use esports for official recruitment due to these concerns.⁸

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of U.S. Military Esports Programs

Branch	Team/Program Name	Stated Mission	Primary Game Genres	Target Audience/Focus	Documented Controversies/Challenges
U.S. Army	U.S. Army Esports (USAE)	Connect America to its Army through a passion for gaming, making the force more relatable.⁹	FPS, MOBA, Fighting Games (e.g., Call of Duty, League of Legends).¹¹	Broad youth gaming demographic, aiming for emotional connection and recruitment leads.	Censorship of war crime discussions, raising First Amendment concerns; fake giveaways seen as unethical recruitment.⁷
U.S. Navy	Goats & Glory	To be the “‘Blue Angels’ of esports,” generating interest rather than direct recruiting.⁸	Team-based competitive games (e.g., Valorant, Rocket League).⁸	High-quality, tech-savvy youth interested in STEM fields.¹⁰	Learned from early Army missteps, adjusting streaming strategy to avoid negative feedback.⁸
U.S. Air Force/Space Force	Air Force Gaming	Promote resilience, mental acuity, and cohesion within the force.¹³	Diverse, including global tournaments and base-level leagues (e.g., Call of Duty).¹³	Primarily internal active-duty personnel, but also attracts potential recruits through outreach.	Fewer public controversies, as it originated as a grassroots program for internal cohesion.

IV. The Gamer’s Mind: Transferable Cognitive Skills for the Modern Warfighter

The Cognitive Edge of Gamers

A large body of research, including studies funded by military bodies like the Office of Naval Research (ONR), confirms that experienced video game players outperform non-players in key cognitive domains.⁵ These advantages include enhanced perception, faster information processing, better short-term memory, and superior sustained attention.⁵ A meta-analysis revealed that esports experts have a significant advantage in spatial cognition and attention.¹⁷

From Controller to Kill Chain: Direct Application in Unmanned Systems

Skills honed in gaming are directly transferable to high-stress, high-tech military roles.⁴ The hand-eye coordination developed by gamers is particularly valuable for controlling drone sensors, which are often operated with controllers similar to those used for PlayStation consoles.¹⁹ One study found that video gamers performed better as drone operators than general aviation pilots, second only to professional military or airline pilots, particularly in their ability to handle stressful situations (lower neuroticism scores).¹⁹

The cognitive demands of drone operation—processing massive data streams in real-time, monitoring multiple screens, and making high-stakes decisions—are highly analogous to the cognitive load experienced by elite esports players.¹⁸ Key required abilities include spatial orientation, logical reasoning, and attentional selection.²¹

Mapping Game Genres to Diverse Military Roles

The military’s interest has evolved from a general appreciation of gamers’ cognitive advantages to a specific recognition of the distinct skill sets cultivated by different game genres.

First-Person Shooters (FPS): Games like Call of Duty and Counter-Strike significantly improve reaction time, attention to detail, visuospatial attention, and rapid decision-making.⁴ These skills are directly applicable to tactical roles like infantry and special operations and are highly relevant for operating armed first-person view (FPV) drones.
Real-Time Strategy (RTS) & Multiplayer Online Battle Arenas (MOBA): Titles such as StarCraft and League of Legends cultivate strategic thinking, long-term planning, resource management, and task-switching/mental flexibility.⁴ These macro-level skills are invaluable for command and control positions, intelligence analysis, and managing swarms of autonomous systems.²³
Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPG): Games like World of Warcraft foster collaboration, communication, and judgment within large, diverse teams—essential skills for joint operations and team coordination.⁴

This understanding marks a further maturation of military human capital strategy. Initially, military interest in gamers was general, based on their broadly superior cognitive skills.⁵ As research progressed, the distinct cognitive benefits of different game genres became clear.⁴ Modern military operations are increasingly specialized; the cognitive profile required for an FPV drone operator on a strike mission is different from that of a commander managing a swarm of surveillance drones or an intelligence analyst processing data. The logical next step in military HR strategy is to map these genre-specific cognitive profiles to specific Military Occupational Specialties (MOS). For example, a top

Call of Duty player might be fast-tracked for FPV drone operator training (like the UALC program ²⁴), while a top

StarCraft player might be identified as a candidate for a command and control or cyber warfare officer role. This represents a third evolution from general PR to targeted cognitive talent acquisition.

Table 2: Mapping Game Genres, Cognitive Skills, and Military Roles

Game Genre	Key Enhanced Cognitive Skills	Direct Military Application/Role
First-Person Shooter (FPS)	Rapid reaction time, hand-eye coordination, sustained attention, visuospatial processing, quick decision-making under pressure.⁴	FPV attack drone operator, close-quarters combatant (infantry, special forces), quick reaction forces, target acquisition and identification.
Real-Time Strategy (RTS) / MOBA	Strategic planning, resource management, multitasking, mental flexibility, macro-level situational awareness.⁴	Command and control officer, intelligence analyst, drone swarm coordinator, logistics planning, cyber warfare strategist.
Massively Multiplayer Online RPG (MMORPG)	Team collaboration, communication, leadership, complex problem-solving, judgment.⁴	Joint operations teams, mission planning cells, intelligence fusion centers, inter-agency coordination.
Puzzle/Problem-Solving Games	Pattern recognition, problem-solving, long-term planning, perseverance.⁴	Cryptography, signals intelligence analysis, tactical planning, troubleshooting and maintenance.

V. The Synthetic Battlefield: Gamification and Simulation in 21st-Century Military Training

Leveraging Commercial Game Engines

Military training is undergoing a paradigm shift away from proprietary, expensive simulators toward versatile, cost-effective, and graphically superior commercial game engines.²⁶

Unreal Engine & Unity: These engines are renowned for their high-fidelity graphics, robust physics simulations, and AI integration, making them ideal for creating realistic virtual environments for training, strategy testing, and equipment evaluation.²⁶ Defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Cubic Global Defense are actively partnering with engine developers like Epic Games (Unreal) to build next-generation training solutions.²⁸

Advanced Simulation Case Studies

U.S. Navy Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Trainer: Cubic used Unreal Engine 4 to create a hyper-realistic virtual training environment for U.S. Navy engineering technicians, replicating two 400-foot Littoral Combat Ships. The project involved approximately 50,000 assets and 30,000 interactive components. To achieve centimeter-level accuracy, the team laser-scanned the actual ships, ultimately delivering 1,500 hours of immersive training content.²⁹
Joint Fires & Close Air Support: SimCentric Technologies leverages Unreal Engine for its accredited SAF-FIRES product, a scalable simulation for training Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTACs).³⁰
Virtual Battlespace (VBS): A simulation platform designed for military applications, VBS has become a standard tool for mission rehearsal and combat training for forces including the U.S. Army and NATO.²⁶ Its developer, Bohemia Interactive Simulations (BISim), is now integrating its VBS platform with Unreal Engine to ensure perfect correlation of terrain data between different runtime environments.³²

The Rise of Immersive Technologies (AR/VR)

Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) are revolutionizing training for complex tasks like combat maneuvers, flight training, and medical procedures by providing risk-free, immersive environments.³³ Integrated with AI, these simulations can dynamically adjust threat levels based on trainee performance, enhancing resilience and decision-making.³¹

U.S. Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS): A flagship program based on Microsoft’s HoloLens, IVAS aims to equip soldiers with a ruggedized AR headset.¹⁵ It overlays digital information like maps, friendly/enemy positions, and thermal imagery onto the soldier’s field of view, dramatically enhancing situational awareness.³⁶ The system includes a component for extended reality (XR)-based training called the Squad Immersive Virtual Trainer (SiVT).¹⁵
IVAS Challenges and Evolution: The program has faced significant challenges, including user-reported physical discomfort (headaches, nausea) and concerns about user acceptance, potentially wasting up to $21.88 billion.³⁶ This has led to a redesign (IVAS 1.2) and the transfer of the main contract from Microsoft to defense tech company Anduril, which will integrate its AI-powered Lattice OS.¹⁵

This adoption of commercial game engines has created a “military-entertainment-technology complex” that accelerates innovation but also introduces new strategic dependencies and vulnerabilities. The military and its contractors are increasingly reliant on commercial companies like Epic Games (Unreal), Unity Technologies, and Microsoft (HoloLens/IVAS) for their core training and simulation infrastructure.²⁶ This is a departure from the past, where the DoD relied primarily on in-house or traditional defense contractors. This reliance accelerates development and reduces costs by piggybacking on the massive R&D investment of the multi-billion dollar gaming industry.²⁶ However, it also creates strategic dependencies. The training readiness of the armed forces could be impacted by the business decisions, licensing changes (like Unity’s controversial runtime fee policy ²⁷), or even the geopolitical stances of commercial companies. Furthermore, it introduces new cybersecurity risks. A successful breach of a widely used commercial game engine could potentially introduce vulnerabilities into numerous military training simulations across multiple services and allied nations. The cybersecurity concerns surrounding the IVAS program highlight this risk.¹⁵ This elevates the relationship from the classic “military-entertainment complex” (focused on PR and influence) to a deeper, more critical technological integration with inherent strategic risks.

VI. The Remote Warrior: The Human Factor in Unmanned Warfare

Cognitive and Psychological Profile of the Drone Operator

Effective drone operation relies more on cognitive abilities than on traditional “stick-and-rudder” skills.²¹ Key attributes include:

Cognitive Abilities: High levels of spatial orientation, sustained attention (vigilance), logical reasoning, visual short-term memory, and the ability to multitask effectively under high cognitive load.²⁰
Psychological Traits: Superior stress tolerance and conscientiousness are critical.⁴⁰ Operators must manage the paradox of being physically safe while psychologically immersed in graphic, high-stakes combat situations.⁴¹

The ‘PlayStation Mentality’ Paradox and its Psychological Toll

The term “PlayStation mentality” is often used to describe remote killing as being like a video game, creating emotional distance.⁴¹ The reality is far more stressful and complex. Drone operators face unique psychological stressors: prolonged periods of high vigilance, the “psychological whiplash” of shifting between combatant and civilian life daily, and the impact of witnessing the graphic aftermath of strikes.⁴¹ This leads to high rates of emotional exhaustion, burnout, and mental health issues, including adjustment disorders and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), sometimes at rates higher than personnel returning from physical deployment.⁴¹

Gamified Training as a Mitigation Strategy

Modern training programs use gamification not just to teach skills but also to stress-inoculate operators and enhance performance.

U.S. Army’s Unmanned Advanced Lethality Course (UALC): A new program at Fort Rucker designed to rapidly train soldiers on lethal FPV drones.²⁴ The course explicitly requires 20 to 25 hours of training on commercial drone simulators before live flight, demonstrating the formal integration of gamified learning.²⁴
VR for Stress Inoculation and PTSD Treatment: VR environments are used to expose trainees to realistic stressors in a controlled setting to promote emotional habituation.⁴³ VR Exposure Therapy (VRET) is also used to treat combat-related PTSD by re-immersing soldiers in virtual scenarios of their traumatic events to help them process the memories.⁴⁴
Ukraine’s “Army of Drones” Program: A real-world example of operational gamification where drone units earn reward points for confirmed kills of Russian targets (e.g., a tank is worth 40 points). The system serves as a motivational tool, verifies strike effectiveness, and allows high command to prioritize targets by adjusting point values.⁴⁵

However, military human factors programs face a fundamental contradiction: the psychological profile of the elite gamer conflicts with the documented psychological risks of remote warfare. The military actively recruits gamers for their demonstrated cognitive abilities and performance under pressure in virtual environments.⁶ Yet, many career gamers are themselves at risk for mental health issues like depression, anxiety, social isolation, and addiction due to excessive play and high-pressure competition.⁴⁶ At the same time, the job of a military drone operator carries its own severe psychological risks, including burnout, emotional disengagement, and PTSD, which, while different, could be exacerbated by pre-existing vulnerabilities.⁴¹

This presents a stark challenge: the target recruitment pool may be simultaneously more susceptible to the specific psychological stressors of the job they are being recruited for. A mind that thrives on the dopamine reward loops of gaming may react very differently to the moral and emotional weight of real-world lethal action. This demands that military selection and training programs must be able to distinguish between individuals who possess the right cognitive skills and those who also have the psychological resilience to withstand the unique trauma of remote warfare. Being a good gamer is not enough; it could even be a risk factor if not properly assessed.

VII. A Tale of Three Powers: A Comparative Analysis of National Strategies

United States

Focus: Leveraging its dominant commercial technology and entertainment industries (the “military-entertainment-technology complex”) in a two-pronged approach: public-facing esports for recruitment and PR ¹⁰, and deep industry partnerships for technologically superior, high-fidelity training systems like IVAS and advanced simulators.²⁸
Strategy: Aims to maintain a qualitative edge through technological overmatch and by attracting high-quality, tech-savvy personnel. The approach is decentralized across services but unified by its reliance on commercial innovation.

China (People’s Liberation Army)

Focus: A systematic, top-down implementation of “synthetic training” to overcome historical shortfalls in joint operations.⁴⁸ The emphasis is not on public recruitment but on large-scale, integrated exercises.
Strategy: The PLA uses simulation training centers with interconnected terminals (drone simulators, tank simulators) to train entire battalion-sized units to fight cohesively.⁴⁸ This allows them to test and refine tactics, formations, and command structures in a virtual environment before live-fire exercises.⁴⁸ This is particularly evident in their large-scale, multi-service military exercises simulating an attack on Taiwan, which heavily feature simulated precision strikes and joint blockades.⁵⁰

Russia

Focus: Asymmetric application of gaming technology to counter Western advantages and project influence.
Strategy:
- Specialized Training: Russia is developing advanced training simulators with VR capabilities for its prized Electronic Warfare (EW) troops, using systems like “MagniiREB” and “Mauzer” to shorten training cycles and practice complex scenarios in a virtual environment.⁵²
- Propaganda and Influence Operations: Russia actively uses video games as a propaganda tool. This includes Russian streamers promoting pro-Kremlin narratives in games like Minecraft and Hearts of Iron IV ⁵³, and the development of bespoke games based on the war in Ukraine, such as
  Best in Hell.⁵⁵ They have also targeted African youth with a modified game to spread anti-Western sentiment.⁵³
- Battlefield Adaptation: In the current conflict, both Russia and Ukraine are teaching schoolchildren to operate drones and see gamers as a key recruitment pool for drone operators, highlighting the immediate real-world relevance of these skills.⁵⁶

The divergent national paths in military gamification are a direct reflection of core strategic philosophies. The U.S., with its world-leading tech and entertainment sectors, outsources innovation (Unreal Engine, Microsoft) and leverages cultural power (esports) to attract top talent, aiming to preserve its qualitative edge. China’s strategy reflects its centralized, state-driven model and its primary military objective: perfecting complex, large-scale joint operations for a potential Taiwan contingency. For the PLA, synthetic training is not PR; it is the “sharpening stone” for a mass war machine.⁴⁸ Russia’s strategy is that of a power seeking to disrupt a stronger adversary. Lacking the U.S. commercial tech ecosystem or China’s scale, Russia focuses its resources on niche but high-impact areas like EW and leverages the low cost and wide reach of gaming for information warfare and propaganda, turning Western cultural products into weapons against the West. These are not just tactical differences; they are direct expressions of grand strategy, industrial base, and geopolitical posture.

Table 3: Geopolitical Analysis of National Military Gamification Paths

Country	Primary Focus	Key Technologies/Platforms	Strategic Goal
United States	Recruitment/Talent Attraction; Technological Superiority.¹¹	Commercial Game Engines (Unreal, Unity); AR/VR (IVAS); Official Esports Teams.¹⁵	Maintain a technological overmatch and attract high-quality, tech-savvy personnel for future high-end conflicts.
China	Joint Operations Training; Systemic Efficiency.⁴⁸	Integrated Synthetic Training Centers; Multi-platform Simulators (tank, drone); Large-scale Joint Exercises.⁴⁸	Overcome inter-service coordination shortfalls and enhance proficiency in large-scale, complex campaigns for specific geopolitical objectives (e.g., Taiwan).
Russia	Asymmetric Warfare; Propaganda & Information Operations.⁵²	Specialized Electronic Warfare (EW) Simulators (MagniiREB); Leveraging existing game platforms for propaganda; Developing bespoke propaganda games.⁵²	Offset adversary conventional advantages with limited resources by achieving breakthroughs in key niches (e.g., EW) and using information warfare to project influence in targeted regions.

VIII. The Gamification of Conflict: Ethical Implications and Future Trajectories

Desensitization and Moral Disengagement

A central ethical critique is that constant exposure to realistic, gamified violence normalizes it and desensitizes players and operators to the real-world horrors of war.⁵⁷ Studies using fMRI have shown that playing violent video games can reduce emotional and physiological responses to real violence, blunting the empathy necessary for moral reasoning.⁵⁷ The very design of games, which turns violent acts into entertainment through points and rewards, can trivialize the act of killing.⁵⁸ This is amplified in Augmented Reality (AR), where simulated violent actions can create “muscle memory,” potentially blurring the line between virtual and real behavior.⁶¹

Blurred Lines and the Military-Entertainment Complex

The collaboration between game developers and military consultants blurs the line between entertainment and military recruitment propaganda.⁵⁸ Games like

America’s Army were created specifically as recruitment tools, glorifying military service while downplaying its risks.⁵⁸ This creates an ethical tension: the gaming industry claims its products are “harmless entertainment” while simultaneously marketing them to the military as effective training tools capable of shaping skills and even moral dispositions.⁶² Critics argue this process simplifies the complexities of war and dissolves the tragic responsibility that should accompany the act of killing.⁵⁹

The Psychological Impact of Virtual War

While virtual training can be used to treat PTSD ⁴⁴, the constant presence of drones on the modern battlefield—the direct product of the technologies and skills discussed—is itself a powerful source of psychological trauma for those on the receiving end. It creates a persistent anticipatory anxiety, akin to “shell shock,” even without direct attack.⁶³ For the operators, the virtualization of war does not eliminate trauma but transforms its nature, creating stressors unique to remote combat.⁴¹

Strategic Outlook and Recommendations

Future Trajectory: The convergence is irreversible and will accelerate. Future developments will likely include the use of AI-driven adversaries in training, the use of game mechanics to command autonomous swarms, and the more seamless integration of AR/VR into live combat operations.
Recommendations for Policymakers:
1. Develop Ethical Frameworks: Establish clear ethical guidelines for military recruitment on gaming platforms, particularly concerning the targeting of minors and transparency.
2. Invest in Psychological Resilience: Military selection and training programs for remote operators must go beyond cognitive skill assessment to include robust psychological screening and resilience training specifically tailored to the unique stressors of virtual warfare.
3. Manage Technological Dependencies: Acknowledge and mitigate the strategic risks of relying heavily on commercial, and sometimes foreign-owned, technology for critical training infrastructure through diversification and investment in open-source alternatives.
4. Foster Public Discourse: Promote a national conversation about the societal impact of the gamification of war to ensure that as the means of warfare change, public understanding of its gravity is not diminished.

Cited works

Military–entertainment complex - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93entertainment_complex
Games Without Frontiers: The Emergence and Presence of the Military-Entertainment Complex - UC Davis Library, https://library.ucdavis.edu/exhibit/games-without-frontiers-the-emergence-and-presence-of-the-military-entertainment-complex/
How the US Military Uses Hollywood to Make Propaganda - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCu4vM5dK9I
Why Video Gamers Make Great First Responders and Military …, https://www.military.com/off-duty/games/why-video-gamers-make-great-first-responders-and-military-recruits.html
How eSports & Gaming might Improve your Cognitive Abilities – Even in Military a Environment, https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2020/02/10/how-esports-gaming-might-improve-your-cognitive-abilities-even-in-military-a-environment/
Video Games Can Enhance Warrior Cognitive Performance - Navy.mil, https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2938975/video-games-can-enhance-warrior-cognitive-performance/
U.S. Army Esports - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Army_Esports
The US military is embedded in the gaming world. Its target: teen …, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/14/us-military-recruiting-video-games-targeting-teenagers
Army Esports Team, https://recruiting.army.mil/army_esports/
WANTED: Gamer Sailors for Navy’s ‘Goats & Glory’ ESports Team - USNI News, https://news.usni.org/2022/08/26/wanted-gamer-sailors-for-navys-goats-glory-esports-team
the-u.s.-army-esports-usae-team.docx - Texas Military Department, https://tmd.texas.gov/Data/Sites/1/media/border-mission/ols-rally-point/fy24/the-u.s.-army-esports-usae-team.docx
Air Force Gaming, https://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Tag/182435/air-force-gaming/
Air Force Gaming - MyAirForceLife, https://myairforcelife.com/air-force-gaming/
The AFG Base Support Program - Air Force Gaming, https://airforcegaming.com/base-support
Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS): Background …, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13022
US Air Force Gaming | ESTV Partner, https://www.estv.co/content-creators/us-air-force-gaming
Cognitive expertise in esport experts: a three-level model meta-analysis - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11316462/
Commentary on the Transferability of Esports to Military and Emergency Responder Roles in, https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jege/3/1/article-jege.2025-0009.xml
STUDY FINDS THAT VIDEO GAMERS ARE BETTER THAN GA PILOTS AS UAV OPERATORS - The Aviation Geek Club, https://theaviationgeekclub.com/study-finds-video-gamers-better-ga-pilots-uav-operators/
Understanding Mental Workload in UAV Operators: The Role of Eye-Tracking Technology, https://www.cambridge.org/core/blog/2025/04/25/understanding-mental-workload-in-uav-operators-the-role-of-eye-tracking-technology/
Full article: Selection of Norwegian police drone operators: an evaluation of selected cognitive tests from “The Vienna Test System” - Taylor & Francis Online, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15614263.2023.2179052
Commentary on the Transferability of Esports to Military and Emergency Responder Roles - Human Kinetics Journals, https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jege/3/1/article-jege.2025-0009.pdf
Take Aim! FPS vs. RTS: Which Gaming Genre Boosts Cognitive Abilities?, https://www.christian-staedter.com/take-aim-fps-vs-rts-which-gaming-genre-boosts-cognitive-abilities/
U.S. Army Aviation Center of Excellence Launches Unmanned …, https://www.army.mil/article/287907/u_s_army_aviation_center_of_excellence_launches_unmanned_advanced_lethality_course_to_equip_soldiers_for_future_warfare
What does neuroscience say about competitive gaming? Do gamers care? - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/Competitiveoverwatch/comments/4wd9c3/what_does_neuroscience_say_about_competitive/
Game Engine For Military Simulations, https://www.meegle.com/en_us/topics/game-engine/game-engine-for-military-simulations
Unity (game engine) - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_(game_engine)
Gaming Technology: The Future of Training | Lockheed Martin, https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/2022/gaming-technology-the-future-of-training.html
Cubic and UE4 create waves in the training and simulation …, https://www.unrealengine.com/de/spotlights/cubic-and-ue4-create-waves-in-the-training-and-simulation-industry
SimCentric scales up tactical military simulation training with Unreal Engine, https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/spotlights/simcentric-scales-up-tactical-military-simulation-training-with-unreal-engine
Brief History of Military Gaming: How Simulations Shaped Modern Combat Training, https://centralfloridatechgrove.org/brief-history-of-military-gaming-how-simulations-shaped-modern-combat-training/
Bohemia Interactive Simulations Uses Epic Games MegaGrant to Extend Mantle ETM Capabilities to Unreal, https://bisimulations.com/news/press-releases/bohemia-interactive-simulations-uses-epic-games-megagrant-extend-mantle/
Enhancing Military Training with AR and VR Technologies | Attract Group, https://attractgroup.com/blog/enhancing-military-training-with-ar-and-vr-technologies/
4个虚拟现实应用于军事国防领域的使用案例 - TechViz 博客, https://blog.techviz.cn/4-use-cases-vr-in-the-military-and-defense-industry
How AI and XR Are Redefining Military Training - YORD Studio, https://yordstudio.com/how-ai-and-xr-are-redefining-military-training/
Integrated Visual Augmentation System - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Visual_Augmentation_System
The Tactical Considerations of Augmented and Mixed Reality Implementation - Army University Press, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/PDF-UA-docs/Kallberg-UA.pdf
Audit of the Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System (DODIG-2022-085), https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/Article/3007502/audit-of-the-armys-integrated-visual-augmentation-system-dodig-2022-085/
Human Factors Issues in UAS Training - CORE Scholar, https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1089&context=isap_2007
PSYCHOLOGICAL APTITUDE FOR DRONE PILOTS: A REVIEW OF KEY TRAITS AND COGNITIVE DEMANDS, https://mmsl.cz/pdfs/mms/2025/88/02.pdf
Cry in the sky: Psychological impact on drone operators - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8611566/
Psychological Effects on UAV Operators and Proposed Mitigation Strategies to Combat PTSD - DTIC, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1150884.pdf
Human Emotional State and its Relevance for Military VR Training | USC ICT, https://ict.usc.edu/pubs/Human%20Emotional%20State%20and%20its%20Relevance%20for%20Military%20VR%20Training.pdf
Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy to combat PTSD | Article | The United States Army, https://www.army.mil/article/33128/virtual_reality_exposure_therapy_to_combat_ptsd
How Ukraine Gamified Drone Warfare - Time Magazine, https://time.com/7319847/7319847/
Influence of Esports on stress: A systematic review - PMC - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8188925/
It’s Virtually the Same: Psychological Challenges of eSports Athletes, https://appliedsportpsych.org/blog/2020/10/its-virtually-the-same-psychological-challenges-of-esports-athletes/
Chinese PLA Increasing Use of Simulation for Coordinated Training …, https://www.halldale.com/defence/chinese-pla-increasing-simulation-coordinated-training
Chinese Military Exercises Highlight Improvements In Joint Operations, https://oe.tradoc.army.mil/product/chinese-military-exercises-highlight-improvements-in-joint-operations/
China’s Military Exercises Around Taiwan: Trends and Patterns, https://globaltaiwan.org/2024/10/chinas-military-exercises-around-taiwan-trends-and-patterns/
解放军模拟对台联合精准打击台出动战机布防密控中共火箭军动向 - 美国之音, https://www.voachinese.com/a/china-simulates-striking-taiwan-on-second-day-of-drills-04092023/7042929.html
俄罗斯如何培训高质量电子战人才- 安全内参| 决策者的网络安全知识库, https://www.secrss.com/articles/47070
Russia uses video games in Africa to spread anti-Western propaganda - DFRLab, https://dfrlab.org/2024/08/12/russia-uses-video-games-in-africa-to-spread-anti-western-propaganda/
How Russia is Using Online Video Games to Promote the War in Ukraine - Just Security, https://www.justsecurity.org/87566/how-russia-is-using-online-video-games-to-promote-the-war-in-ukraine/
A Digital Soldier: How Russia Turns Computer Games into a Propaganda Tool, https://ukraineworld.org/en/articles/infowatch/russia-propaganda
The New Warrior: Trained in the Bedroom, Deadly on the Battlefield - CEPA, https://cepa.org/article/the-new-warrior-trained-in-the-bedroom-deadly-on-the-battlefield/
Desensitization and Violent Video Games: Mechanisms and Evidence - PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34801150/
The ethics of war games: Depictions of conflicts and their social impact - Blog IDC Games, https://idcgames.com/en/blog/the-ethics-of-war-games-depictions-of-conflicts-and-their-social-impact/
When Virtual Reality Becomes Simply, Reality - Stanford University Student Journals, https://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/download/363/199/1473
The dark side of gamification – E-Learning Provocateur, https://ryan2point0.wordpress.com/2015/03/16/the-dark-side-of-gamification/
Augmented Reality Games and Ethical Desensitization - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP, https://www.wnj.com/updates/augmented-reality-games-and-ethical-desensitization/
Playing for Fun, Training for War: Can Popular Claims About …, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284750209_Playing_for_Fun_Training_for_War_Can_Popular_Claims_About_Recreational_Video_Gaming_and_Military_Simulations_be_Reconciled
Drones Having Psychological Impact on Soldiers, https://g2webcontent.z2.web.core.usgovcloudapi.net/OEE/Red%20Diamond/TRADOC_11DEC2024_Drone_Psychological_Impact_Peno_Pettigrew.pdf

September 29, 2025