July 24, 2025
Middle-class families are increasingly relying on high-interest debt just to make ends meet. What are the most effective pathways or structural solutions to help us break this cycle of dependency?
The Debt-Burdened Middle Class: From Diagnosis to Structural Renewal
Part I: The Anatomy of the Middle-Class Debt Crisis
Section 1.1: The Fraying of the American Dream: Defining and Measuring the Crisis
The concept of the American middle class has long been synonymous with a specific standard of living characterized by economic stability and upward mobility. This standard traditionally includes the ability to afford comfortable housing, access quality healthcare and education, invest for the future, and retire in comfort.¹ However, a growing body of evidence indicates that this standard is becoming increasingly difficult for a majority of American families to maintain. The result is a deepening crisis of debt dependency, where high-interest credit is no longer a tool for convenience but a means of survival. This crisis is not defined by a lack of aspiration but by a structural failure of the economy to support the foundational pillars of middle-class life.
The economic standing of the middle class has eroded dramatically over the past half-century. In 1970, middle-income families commanded 63% of the total U.S. household income. By 2022, that share had plummeted to just 43%, while the share for upper-income households swelled from 29% to 48% over the same period.² This is not merely a relative shift but a fundamental hollowing out of the nation’s economic core. The decline in wealth is equally stark. The share of total financial assets and disposable income held by the middle class fell from 20% in 2001 to just 12% in 2013.³ As of the third quarter of 2024, middle-class households hold a mere 8% of all household wealth in the United States.⁴ While the average middle-class household’s net worth stood at $480,000 in Q3 2024, this figure is less than 2% of the average wealth held by the top 1% of households.⁴
A more precise diagnosis of this precarity lies in the concept of “liquidity constraints.” A household is considered liquidity constrained when it lacks easily accessible cash to cover routine expenses while still being able to save for essential long-term investments like education and homeownership.³ Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago reveals a startling reality: approximately 80% of American middle-class households are liquidity constrained.³ This pervasive financial fragility means a vast swath of the population is just one unexpected event—a car repair, a medical emergency, a temporary job loss—away from significant financial hardship.²
The direct consequence of this squeeze is a forced reliance on high-interest debt to bridge the gap. When income is stagnant and savings are nonexistent, credit cards and personal loans become the only available shock absorbers. This is reflected in the fact that one-third of middle-class families in a recent survey reported having more credit card debt than emergency savings.² This is not debt accumulated for luxury consumption; rather, credit has systematically replaced income growth as a means for families to make ends meet in an era of stagnant wages and skyrocketing costs.⁵
Table 1: The Middle-Class Squeeze: A 50-Year Retrospective
Metric | 1970-1979 | 1980-1989 | 1990-1999 | 2000-2009 | 2010-Present |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Middle-Income Share of Total U.S. Household Income | 63% (1970) ² | 56% (1989) ² | 50% (1999) ² | 46% (2009) ² | 43% (2022) ² |
Upper-Income Share of Total U.S. Household Income | 29% (1970) ² | 36% (1989) ² | 43% (1999) ² | 46% (2009) ² | 48% (2022) ² |
Median Hourly Wage (Inflation-Adjusted) | Stagnant ⁶ | Stagnant ⁶ | Stagnant ⁶ | Stagnant ⁶ | Stagnant ⁶ |
Net Productivity Growth vs. Wage Growth | Decoupling Begins ⁶ | Gap Widens ⁶ | Gap Widens ⁶ | Gap Widens ⁶ | Gap Widens ⁶ |
Median Home Price to Median Income Ratio | ~3.5x | ~4.0x | ~4.5x | ~5.5x | ~6.0x ⁸ |
Average Annual Cost of Public 4-Year College (Inflation-Adjusted) | Steady Increase ² | Accelerated Increase ² | Accelerated Increase ² | Skyrocketing ² | Skyrocketing ² |
Average Annual Family Health Insurance Premium (Inflation-Adjusted) | N/A | Rising ⁹ | Rising Sharply ⁹ | Skyrocketing ⁹ | Skyrocketing ⁹ |
Section 1.2: The Psychology and Social Cost of Debt
The escalating debt burden on the middle class extends far beyond household balance sheets, imposing significant psychological and social costs. The financial stress associated with high debt levels is a major contributor to compromised physical and mental health, eroding overall quality of life.² Research confirms that individuals in the middle of the income distribution suffer the greatest disruptions to their mental well-being from carrying debt, whereas affluent borrowers are relatively unaffected, often using short-term debt as a convenience tool rather than a necessity.⁵ This debt-induced stress can lead to anxiety and depression, creating a vicious cycle where financial precarity harms health, and poor health can lead to further financial strain.¹⁰
This crisis also casts a long intergenerational shadow. When families are saddled with high levels of debt, their capacity to invest in the future is severely diminished. Opportunities to save for a down payment on a home, fund a child’s education, or build a retirement nest egg are crowded out by the immediate need to service existing loans.² This dynamic threatens to lock in economic disadvantage, making it profoundly difficult for the children of indebted middle-class families to advance economically. Without systemic intervention, these negative impacts can span generations, calcifying class stratification and undermining the promise of upward mobility.¹
The experience of other nations provides a cautionary tale about the potential societal consequences. In China, for instance, a rapid increase in household debt has created a profound “psychological burden reshaping the social fabric”.¹¹ The immense social shame surrounding financial trouble has led many to suffer in silence or experience what researchers term
shesi, or “social death.” This phenomenon, where individuals feel trapped and isolated by their financial obligations, underscores the potential for widespread debt to become a destabilizing social force, eroding community trust and individual well-being.¹¹ As the American middle class travels further down a similar path of indebtedness, these social costs loom as a significant, if often overlooked, dimension of the crisis.
Part II: The Vicious Cycle: Unpacking the Core Drivers
The dependency on high-interest debt is not a series of isolated household misfortunes but the logical outcome of several powerful, interlocking economic trends that have systematically squeezed the middle class for decades. This section deconstructs the primary drivers of this crisis: the widening chasm between wages and the cost of living, and the transformation of housing, healthcare, and education from pillars of stability into sources of financial risk and debt.
Section 2.1: The Great Decoupling: Wage Stagnation vs. The Cost of Living
At the heart of the middle-class debt crisis is a fundamental economic schism: for more than four decades, the link between economic growth and the financial well-being of the typical worker has been severed. Since 1979, the United States has experienced substantial growth in real GDP (149%) and net productivity (64%), yet the vast majority of American workers have seen their hourly wages stagnate or decline in real terms.⁶ This “Great Decoupling” is the primary engine of the affordability crisis. The economic gains that could have funded broad-based prosperity have instead accrued disproportionately to the top of the income distribution, a result of deliberate policy choices that have suppressed wage growth for the many.⁷
While nominal wages have risen modestly, their purchasing power has failed to keep pace with the escalating costs of essential goods and services.¹² Over the past 25 years, while nominal wages have increased by 11%, the median worker’s actual spending power has
decreased by 4%.⁹ This erosion of real income has made a dignified standard of living increasingly unattainable. According to a 2025 analysis by the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP), the cost of maintaining a “minimal quality of life”—a metric that includes not only basic survival needs but also essentials for social participation like basic entertainment, technology, and childcare—has doubled since 2001. This standard of living is now financially out of reach for the bottom 60% of American households, a group that includes those earning up to $100,000 annually.⁹ When the cost of a middle-class existence outstrips the income available to support it, families are left with an impossible choice: forgo a decent life or finance it with debt.
Section 2.2: The Housing Hurdle: From Asset to Liability
For generations, homeownership was the primary vehicle for middle-class wealth accumulation. Today, it has become a primary driver of financial instability and debt. The housing affordability gap has widened into a chasm. Before the pandemic, approximately half of all homes listed for sale were considered affordable for a household with an annual income of $75,000; by 2025, that figure had collapsed to just one in five.¹⁴ This crisis is fueled by a confluence of supply shortages, market financialization, and rising hidden costs.
First, the nation faces a severe and chronic housing supply shortage, with estimates suggesting a deficit of up to 5.5 million homes.⁸ This shortage is a direct legacy of the 2008 financial crisis, which triggered a multi-year collapse in new construction from which the market has never fully recovered.¹⁴ The problem is compounded at the local level by restrictive zoning ordinances and land-use regulations that make it difficult and expensive to build new housing, particularly the “missing middle” housing types that are more affordable for middle-income families.¹⁴
Second, the nature of the housing market itself has changed. It is increasingly driven by large-scale wealth investment rather than simply by the demand of families seeking shelter.¹⁶ This “uncoupling” of home prices from local wages creates a polarized market where households without significant existing assets are unable to compete, regardless of their income. This dynamic is actively enabled by financial and policy innovations that prioritize high asset prices over affordability. These include the proliferation of 40- and 50-year mortgages, the adoption of new credit scoring models that stretch eligibility, and the expansion of tax deductions like SALT, all of which function to keep prices artificially inflated rather than allowing for a necessary market correction.¹⁷ The implicit goal of the system has shifted from promoting broad homeownership to protecting the value of housing as a financial asset.
Third, even for existing homeowners, the financial burden is intensifying. The total cost of homeownership extends far beyond the mortgage payment. Non-mortgage expenses—including utilities, homeowners insurance, and real estate taxes—are increasing at more than double the rate of overall inflation.¹⁸ These escalating, unavoidable costs stretch household budgets to their breaking point and are a direct contributor to the rise in credit card debt, as families turn to revolving credit to cover these essential housing-related bills.¹⁸
Section 2.3: The Healthcare Burden: Insured but Insecure
The American healthcare system presents a painful paradox for the middle class: despite historically high rates of insurance coverage, medical debt remains a pervasive and crippling problem. Over 90% of the U.S. population is insured, yet an estimated 41% of adults report carrying debt from medical or dental bills.¹⁹ This burden falls with surprising weight on middle-income households. A 2020 study found that families with incomes between $50,000 and $100,000 had the highest rate of medical debt at 23.5%, surpassing both lower-income (22%) and higher-income groups.²¹
The primary driver of this phenomenon is the rise of underinsurance. Having a health insurance card does not guarantee affordable access to care. The proliferation of high-deductible health plans and other forms of significant cost-sharing means that even insured families can face thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs from a single medical event.²⁰ The Commonwealth Fund found that 23% of working-age adults with consistent insurance coverage were functionally “underinsured,” leaving them exposed to unaffordable bills.²⁴
This creates a “middle-class trap.” These families often earn too much to qualify for the most generous public programs like Medicaid or for substantial financial assistance from nonprofit hospitals.²¹ At the same time, they lack the liquid savings and disposable income of wealthier households to absorb high deductibles, copayments, and non-covered expenses. They are caught in a policy no-man’s-land, with the financial responsibility for systemic failures shifted squarely onto their shoulders.
These failures are rooted in the exorbitant and inefficient nature of the U.S. healthcare system. With some of the highest healthcare costs in the world, a lack of price transparency, and a fragmented delivery system that generates administrative waste and duplicated services, the underlying price of care is exceptionally high.¹⁰ These systemic costs are ultimately passed down to consumers in the form of higher premiums, higher deductibles, and higher bills, fueling the cycle of medical debt.
Section 2.4: The Education Equation: A Degree’s Diminishing Return on Investment
Higher education, long held as the most reliable pathway to the middle class, has paradoxically become one of the greatest obstacles to achieving it. The necessity of a college degree for economic mobility has coincided with an explosion in cost, forcing students and their families to take on unprecedented levels of debt. This debt now acts as a significant barrier to entry into the middle class, delaying or preventing the very life milestones it was meant to facilitate.²⁵
The scale of the problem is immense. Total student loan debt in the United States reached $1.6 trillion at the end of 2023, making it the third-largest category of household debt after mortgages and auto loans.²⁶ The burden is particularly acute for younger generations who are trying to establish their financial footing. Among households headed by an individual aged 25 to 39, the share with student debt more than doubled in three decades, rising from 19.0% in 1992 to 40.2% in 2022.²⁶
This debt burden has a direct and corrosive effect on the ability of young adults to build wealth and achieve financial stability. The consequences are multifaceted and severe:
Reduced Net Worth: Student debt drastically curtails wealth accumulation. On average, households with student debt have a net worth that is more than three times lower than that of the general population.²⁶
Delayed Homeownership: The monthly burden of student loan payments is a primary impediment to saving for a down payment. One Federal Reserve study estimated that student debt prevented 400,000 young adults from purchasing homes over a decade-long period.²⁶
Heightened Financial Fragility: Carrying significant student debt leaves households more vulnerable to economic shocks, such as a recession or job loss. During the Great Recession, households with student loans experienced significantly higher levels of financial stress.²⁷ The debt reduces a family’s ability to weather emergencies and can negatively impact their overall sense of financial well-being.²⁵
Constrained Career Choices: The pressure to service large loans can distort career paths. Studies show that graduates with high debt levels are more likely to seek out higher-paying corporate positions and less likely to choose lower-paying but socially critical public interest roles, skewing the labor market away from vital sectors.²⁸
The system has created a damaging feedback loop. The pursuit of a degree, intended to secure a middle-class future, now saddles individuals with a decade or more of debt that actively prevents them from buying a home, starting a family, or building savings—the very hallmarks of that future.
Part III: Pathways to Financial Resilience: A Critical Assessment of Structural Solutions
Breaking the cycle of middle-class debt dependency requires a shift from individual-focused advice to an examination of structural reforms. This section critically assesses a range of policy pathways aimed at rebalancing the economy in favor of middle-class households. These solutions target the core drivers of the crisis: stagnant incomes, runaway costs in essential sectors, a predatory credit market, and a weakened community financial infrastructure.
Section 3.1: Rebalancing the Labor Market: Policies to Boost Income
A direct approach to closing the gap between income and expenses is to increase the former. Raising the federal minimum wage is one of the most debated policies in this arena.
Proponents argue that a significant increase, for instance to $15 or $17 per hour, would directly boost the wages of tens of millions of low-wage workers, many of whom are adults in middle-class or aspiring middle-class families.²⁹ Such a move could help reduce poverty, narrow persistent racial and gender wage gaps, and provide families with the income needed to afford basic essentials without resorting to debt.²⁹ Economic modeling suggests that a modest hike could even provide a short-term boost to GDP, as low-wage households have a high marginal propensity to spend any additional income, thus stimulating aggregate demand.³¹
However, this approach is not without significant risks and trade-offs. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and other analyses predict that a large increase to $15 per hour could lead to substantial job losses, with a median estimate of 1.3 million workers becoming jobless.³² The negative effects would be concentrated among teenagers and adults without a high school diploma. Furthermore, businesses would likely pass on a significant portion of the increased labor costs—perhaps as much as 75%—to consumers in the form of higher prices. This could reduce the real income for families living above the poverty line, potentially making the policy a net negative for the overall economy.³² Research also indicates that minimum wage hikes lead to a reduction in job vacancies, particularly in lower-skilled occupations.³⁵ In the long run, firms may respond by substituting capital or higher-skilled labor for the now-more-expensive low-wage workers, leading to detrimental effects for the very group the policy is intended to help.³⁶
The evidence suggests a delicate balance. While modest, incremental increases in the minimum wage appear to have little to no negative effect on employment ³⁷, large, sudden increases pose a greater risk of dislocation. This points toward a more nuanced strategy. A policy that combines a modest increase in the federal minimum wage with a significant expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) could be more effective. This hybrid approach would boost incomes at the lower end of the scale while mitigating the disemployment risks associated with a high wage floor, potentially generating larger welfare gains in the long run.³⁶
Section 3.2: Reforming the Tax Code for Middle-Class Benefit
The tax code is a powerful tool for shaping household financial outcomes. Strategic reforms can provide direct relief to debt-burdened families and shift benefits away from the wealthiest toward the middle class.
The 2021 temporary expansion of the Child Tax Credit (CTC) serves as a compelling case study of direct income support. This policy provided regular monthly payments to nearly all low- and middle-income families with children, with full benefits available to married couples earning up to $150,000.³⁸ The impact was immediate and profound. Survey data shows that families used the funds to cover routine expenses like food, utilities, and rent. Critically, the influx of cash led to a
decreased reliance on credit cards and other high-risk financial services.³⁸ This demonstrates that direct, unconditional cash support can be a powerful tool to address the liquidity crisis at the heart of the debt problem, allowing families to build a small buffer and avoid taking on high-interest debt to manage everyday costs. Importantly, this financial stabilization was achieved without any negative effect on parental employment.³⁸
Beyond direct transfers, restructuring existing tax expenditures can rebalance the system. The Home Mortgage Interest Deduction (MID), for example, is a highly regressive policy that provides the largest benefits to high-income households in the highest tax brackets.⁴⁰ One proposed reform is to replace the deduction with a flat 15% non-refundable tax credit. This change would significantly shift the benefits of the subsidy downward, providing more relief to lower- and middle-income homeowners.⁴⁰ A more ambitious proposal involves eliminating the MID and the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction altogether and using the revenue to fund a much higher standard deduction—for example, $100,000 for a married couple. This would effectively eliminate income tax for most middle-class families, providing a substantial, direct tax cut and dramatically simplifying the tax filing process.⁴¹
However, it is crucial to consider how such tax changes are financed. Tax cuts that are paid for by reducing spending on social programs like Medicare, Medicaid, or food assistance can ultimately leave low- and middle-income households worse off. An analysis by the Brookings Institution showed that when the cost of a tax cut is financed through equal-per-household cuts in benefits or increases in taxes, the net effect can be a significant burden on the bottom 60% of households, making them financially weaker than they were before the reform.⁴² Therefore, any tax reform aimed at helping the middle class must be designed and financed in a progressive manner to be effective.
Section 3.3: Addressing Systemic Costs: Sector-Specific Interventions
While boosting income is essential, it is only half of the equation. Sustainable financial health for the middle class also requires tackling the runaway costs of the three pillars of a secure life: housing, healthcare, and education.
Housing Affordability
The housing crisis is, at its core, a problem of insufficient supply. Therefore, the most fundamental long-term solution is to build more homes. This requires a coordinated national strategy that provides federal incentives to state and local governments to reform restrictive zoning and land-use regulations that stifle new construction.¹⁴ A comprehensive federal housing package is necessary to galvanize action across jurisdictions, addressing everything from development costs to financing barriers.⁴⁴
One tool localities use is Inclusionary Zoning (IZ), which mandates or encourages developers of market-rate projects to set aside a percentage of units as affordable for low- or moderate-income households. Evidence suggests that IZ policies can be an effective tool for producing affordable units, but their design is critical. Mandatory policies that apply jurisdiction-wide and require units targeted to a mix of income levels tend to be the most productive.⁴⁷ However, IZ is not a silver bullet. It can have a modest upward effect on the price of market-rate homes in the surrounding area and must be carefully calibrated with developer incentives, like density bonuses, to avoid chilling new construction.⁴⁹ It should be viewed as one component of a broader housing strategy, not a standalone solution.
To address the immediate barrier of upfront costs, Down Payment Assistance (DPA) programs are highly effective. The inability to save for a down payment is a primary obstacle to homeownership, particularly for households of color. Well-designed DPA programs can bridge this gap. An analysis by the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University found that a $25,000 DPA grant could make homeownership a possibility for an additional 1.1 million income-ready Black and Hispanic renter households.⁵¹ Most government DPA programs are structured as forgivable second mortgages with 0% interest, meaning they do not add to a borrower’s monthly payment burden and are often forgiven entirely after a period of five to ten years.⁵² Despite their effectiveness, awareness of these programs is low, and they have historically been underfunded.¹⁵ A major risk is poor design; the seller-funded DPA programs that proliferated before the 2008 crisis led to disastrous outcomes and high foreclosure rates, highlighting the need for robust government oversight and direct, transparent funding structures.⁵³
Healthcare Cost and Debt
Federal protections against the financial devastation of medical debt are notoriously weak, applying inconsistently and lacking strong enforcement.²³ In this vacuum, states have become laboratories for policy innovation. A growing number of states have enacted laws that provide a roadmap for federal action, including:
Regulating hospital billing and collections practices, such as requiring screening for financial assistance eligibility before initiating collections.
Capping or prohibiting interest on medical debt.
Prohibiting or limiting the use of extraordinary collection actions like wage garnishment and home liens.
Preventing medical debt from being reported to credit agencies, which can ruin a person’s financial standing for years.²³
While these protections are crucial for mitigating the damage, they do not address the root cause. Ultimately, solving the medical debt crisis requires comprehensive healthcare reform aimed at controlling systemic costs. This includes policies that expand access to affordable, high-quality insurance to eliminate the problem of underinsurance; regulate healthcare prices to increase transparency and reduce costs; and streamline the fragmented system to reduce administrative waste.¹⁰ The Affordable Care Act (ACA), for all its limitations, demonstrated the power of federal action to expand coverage and narrow racial disparities in access to care, providing a foundation upon which to build more robust cost-control measures.⁵⁶
Higher Education Affordability
Addressing the student debt crisis requires a two-pronged approach: making repayment more manageable for existing borrowers and controlling costs for future students.
A key structural reform is the overhaul of Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) plans. The Biden-Harris administration’s SAVE (Saving on a Valuable Education) plan is a significant step in this direction. By increasing the amount of income protected from payments (from 150% to 225% of the federal poverty line), capping undergraduate loan payments at 5% of discretionary income, and stopping interest from accumulating beyond what a borrower’s payment covers, the plan makes repayment far more sustainable for low- and middle-income borrowers.²⁵
In addition to improved repayment plans, targeted debt relief remains a vital tool. While broad, universal forgiveness is politically and fiscally contentious, policies should focus on providing relief to borrowers experiencing demonstrable hardship and on fixing long-broken programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and disability discharge, ensuring that the government honors its existing promises to borrowers.⁵⁷ Finally, any long-term solution must address the full cost of attendance. College affordability policies cannot focus solely on tuition; they must also account for the significant non-tuition costs of housing, food, and transportation, which are major drivers of student borrowing.⁵⁷
Section 3.4: Regulating the Credit Market
A direct method for breaking the cycle of high-interest debt is to regulate the market that provides it. The most prominent proposal in this area is the implementation of a national interest rate cap, or usury law.
Proponents advocate for a national cap of 36% Annual Percentage Rate (APR) on all consumer loans, a standard that mirrors the Military Lending Act (MLA), which protects active-duty service members.⁵⁸ This approach is framed as both a moral and an economic imperative. It would effectively outlaw the predatory payday loan industry, where typical two-week loans can carry APRs equivalent to nearly 400%.⁵⁹ A rate cap would act as a form of social insurance, protecting the most vulnerable consumers from exploitative debt traps, especially when they face a sudden financial shock and have few other options.⁶¹
However, critics, including many economists, argue that a national rate cap is a “blunt instrument” with potentially severe unintended consequences.⁶¹ The primary concern is that a hard cap would constrict the supply of legal credit, particularly for borrowers with lower credit scores or less collateral. Lenders might decide it is no longer profitable to serve this segment of the market, potentially pushing these borrowers toward even riskier, unregulated sources of credit, such as offshore lenders or loan sharks.⁶¹ Furthermore, lenders who remain in the market might compensate for lower interest revenue by increasing other fees, such as origination or late fees, or by tightening underwriting standards so severely that millions of borrowers are denied credit altogether.⁶¹
The evidence on the impact of state-level rate caps is mixed, with some studies showing a decline in credit availability following their implementation.⁶⁰ This central tension—protecting consumers versus preserving access to credit—suggests that a rate cap alone is an incomplete solution. To be effective and avoid harming the very people it aims to help, a national rate cap must be implemented as part of a dual strategy. This strategy would involve capping the most predatory forms of lending while simultaneously and aggressively promoting the growth of affordable, responsible alternatives.
Section 3.5: Strengthening Community Financial Infrastructure
A crucial component of a healthier credit market is the presence of strong, mission-driven financial institutions that can provide an alternative to the profit-maximizing ethos of mainstream banks and the predatory nature of fringe lenders. Two types of institutions are central to this effort: Credit Unions (CUs) and Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs).
Credit Unions (CUs) are not-for-profit financial cooperatives owned by their members. This structure fundamentally alters their incentives; their primary goal is to provide value to their members, not to generate profit for external shareholders.⁶⁴ This translates into tangible benefits for middle-class families. CUs consistently offer lower interest rates on a wide range of products, including auto loans, personal loans, and credit cards, as well as lower fees on checking accounts and other services.⁶⁴ Research demonstrates a causal link between borrowing from a credit union and better financial outcomes: CU borrowers experience fewer mortgage delinquencies, achieve higher credit scores over time, and have a lower risk of bankruptcy.⁶⁷ This is because CUs are not only cheaper but also behave differently; they are more likely to work with borrowers who fall behind on payments and are less likely to sell their mortgages on the secondary market, thereby maintaining a direct, long-term relationship with the member.⁶⁷ They represent a natural and effective financial partner for the middle class.⁶⁸
Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) are another pillar of this alternative infrastructure. CDFIs are mission-driven banks, credit unions, and loan funds certified by the U.S. Treasury to provide financial products and services in low-income and other underserved communities that are often ignored by traditional banks.⁶⁹ They function as an “on-ramp to the financial mainstream”.⁷⁰ CDFIs provide affordable credit, financial education, and business development services, directly competing with and reducing reliance on predatory lenders like payday lenders and check-cashing outlets.⁷² They are key financiers of affordable housing, small businesses, community health clinics, and other vital local infrastructure.⁷⁴ Despite operating in higher-risk markets, studies show that CDFIs are as financially stable and efficient as their mainstream counterparts.⁷⁷ Expanding federal support for the CDFI Fund is a direct and proven way to channel capital into communities that need it most, building a more resilient and equitable financial ecosystem from the ground up.⁷²
Section 3.6: The Role and Limits of Financial Education and Counseling
Alongside systemic reforms, empowering individuals with the knowledge and skills to navigate the financial system is an important part of the solution. High-quality financial literacy programs and nonprofit credit counseling services have demonstrated effectiveness in helping individuals manage their finances and reduce debt.
Studies show that financial education can lead to improved financial behaviors, better debt management, and even better mental health by reducing the stress associated with financial uncertainty.⁷⁸ School-based financial literacy programs can have positive spillover effects, as students bring lessons home to their parents, leading to improved credit scores and lower loan default rates, particularly in lower-income households.⁸⁰ For those already in debt,
nonprofit credit counseling offers a vital lifeline. Agencies certified by organizations like the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) provide holistic financial support, often for free or at a very low cost.⁸¹ Their primary tool is the Debt Management Plan (DMP), a structured program where counselors negotiate with a client’s creditors to lower interest rates and consolidate multiple unsecured debts into a single, manageable monthly payment. DMPs are typically designed to help individuals become debt-free in three to five years.⁸¹ Rigorous evaluations have found that consumers who receive counseling show significant reductions in their total and revolving debt balances compared to statistically matched groups of non-counseled individuals.⁸³
However, it is crucial to recognize the limitations of these individual-focused approaches. Critics persuasively argue that an overemphasis on financial literacy can function as a form of victim-blaming. It risks framing systemic problems—like wage stagnation, predatory lending, and exorbitant healthcare costs—as the result of individual ignorance or poor discipline.⁸⁶ This perspective can create a “profound financial illiteracy” by obscuring the structural forces that make financial hardship inevitable for millions, regardless of their budgeting skills.⁸⁶ The belief that education alone can equip a consumer to outmaneuver a complex, rapidly evolving financial industry with vastly greater resources is, as one scholar puts it, “implausible”.⁸⁷ Financial education cannot help a family overcome a catastrophic medical diagnosis, a sudden job loss, or a fundamentally unaffordable housing market.⁸⁷
Therefore, financial education and counseling should be viewed as necessary but insufficient components of a comprehensive strategy. They are powerful tools for helping individuals navigate the existing economic landscape more effectively. They empower people to make better choices within the system they have. But they cannot, on their own, fix a system that is fundamentally unbalanced. True, lasting solutions require pairing these empowerment strategies with the deep structural reforms outlined throughout this report.
Part IV: Forging a Coordinated Strategy: Integrated Recommendations for Sustainable Prosperity
The deepening indebtedness of the American middle class is not a single problem but a complex syndrome driven by decades of systemic economic shifts. Consequently, there is no “silver bullet” solution. Breaking the cycle of debt dependency requires an integrated, multi-level strategy that simultaneously addresses income stagnation, systemic cost pressures, and a dysfunctional credit market. A piecemeal approach—addressing housing without healthcare, or wages without credit regulation—is destined to fail, as relief in one area will simply be consumed by rising pressures in another. This report concludes by proposing a coordinated, three-pronged framework for action and provides a comparative analysis of the key policy levers.
The recommended framework for restoring middle-class financial stability is as follows:
Income & Wealth Generation: Policies must directly increase the financial resources available to middle-class households, rebuilding the asset side of their balance sheets. This includes making the 2021-style expanded Child Tax Credit permanent to provide direct, flexible income support. It involves rebalancing the labor market by pairing modest, indexed increases in the federal minimum wage with an expanded Earned Income Tax Credit. It also requires reforming regressive tax expenditures, such as replacing the Mortgage Interest Deduction with a progressive credit and simplifying the tax code to provide a net tax cut for the middle class.
Systemic Cost Containment: Policies must aggressively tackle the runaway costs of the “Big Three” pillars of a middle-class life. For housing, this means a national strategy to increase supply through federal incentives for local zoning reform, coupled with expanded support for Down Payment Assistance programs and well-designed Inclusionary Zoning. For healthcare, it requires a combination of federal and state action to regulate costs, strengthen consumer protections against medical debt, and move toward universal, comprehensive insurance coverage to eliminate the problem of underinsurance. For education, it means continuing the reform of Income-Driven Repayment plans to make student debt manageable and addressing the full, non-tuition costs of college attendance.
Market Reformation & Consumer Protection: Policies must restructure the financial marketplace to be safer and more equitable. This involves implementing a national 36% APR cap on consumer loans to eliminate the most predatory forms of lending. Critically, this regulatory floor must be paired with a robust “public option” for credit: a significant expansion of federal funding and support for the nation’s Credit Unions and Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs). This dual approach ensures that as predatory options are removed, affordable, mission-driven alternatives are available to fill the gap, preventing a contraction of credit for those who need it most.
Executing this framework requires a new era of coordinated governance. Federal policy can set the national standards and provide the necessary funding for programs like the CTC and CDFI expansion. However, state and local governments are indispensable partners, particularly in implementing policies related to housing (zoning reform), healthcare (medical debt protections), and consumer protection. Only through a sustained, collaborative effort across all levels of government can the foundational economic security of the American middle class be rebuilt.
Table 2: A Comparative Analysis of Structural Solutions
Policy Lever | Brief Description | Key Evidence of Effectiveness | Primary Arguments For (Pros) | Primary Arguments Against/Risks (Cons) | Potential Impact on Middle-Class Debt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal Minimum Wage Increase | Raising the federal minimum wage floor (e.g., to $15-$17/hour). | Boosts wages for millions, can increase short-term GDP.²⁹ | Reduces poverty and wage inequality; increases income for low-wage workers.²⁹ | Potential for job losses, higher consumer prices, and long-term substitution away from low-wage labor.³² | Indirect |
Expanded Child Tax Credit (Permanent) | Providing regular, direct monthly payments to low- and middle-income families with children. | Reduced reliance on credit cards and high-risk financial services; improved nutrition without reducing employment.³⁸ | Directly addresses liquidity constraints; reduces child poverty; boosts financial stability.³⁸ | Significant federal fiscal cost; potential for political disagreement on permanence and funding. | High |
Restructure Mortgage Interest Deduction | Replacing the regressive deduction with a flat 15% non-refundable credit or eliminating it for a higher standard deduction. | Would shift tax benefits from high-income to lower- and middle-income households.⁴⁰ | Increases tax fairness; provides more direct relief to the middle class; simplifies the tax code.⁴⁰ | Politically difficult; could face opposition from real estate and high-income homeowner lobbies. | Medium |
National Housing Supply & Zoning Reform | Federal incentives for state/local governments to ease restrictive zoning and land-use regulations to allow more housing construction. | Easing regulations can encourage more building, which is necessary to address the supply shortage.¹⁴ | Addresses the root cause of the housing crisis (supply); can lower prices and rents over the long term.¹⁵ | Effects are long-term, not immediate; requires overcoming local political resistance (NIMBYism). | Medium (Long-Term) |
Inclusionary Zoning Mandates | Requiring or encouraging developers to include affordable units in new market-rate housing projects. | Effective at producing affordable units if mandatory, jurisdiction-wide, and well-designed.⁴⁷ | Creates economically integrated communities; produces affordable housing with less direct public subsidy.⁴⁹ | Can modestly increase market-rate prices; may slow development if not paired with incentives.⁴⁷ | Low to Medium |
Down Payment Assistance Programs | Providing grants or forgivable loans to help first-time homebuyers with upfront costs. | A $25k grant could enable over 1.1 million new homeowners; most programs do not increase monthly payments.⁵¹ | Directly overcomes the primary barrier to homeownership (lack of savings); helps close racial wealth gaps.⁵¹ | Can inflate home prices if supply is constrained; risk of poor program design leading to defaults.⁵³ | Medium |
State/Federal Medical Debt Protections | Regulating hospital billing, capping interest on medical debt, and preventing it from appearing on credit reports. | State-level actions provide a proven roadmap for reducing the financial harm of medical debt.²³ | Directly protects consumers from the most damaging consequences of medical debt; improves financial stability.⁵⁵ | Does not address the underlying high cost of care; requires comprehensive legislative action. | High |
Income-Driven Student Loan Repayment Reform | Overhauling repayment plans (e.g., SAVE plan) to cap payments based on income and prevent interest accumulation. | Makes repayment more sustainable and prevents debt balances from ballooning.²⁵ | Directly reduces the monthly financial burden of student debt for millions of borrowers.²⁵ | Does not address the upfront cost of college; significant fiscal cost to the government. | High |
National 36% APR Cap | Imposing a national usury law limiting the interest rate on all consumer loans to 36% APR. | Eliminates predatory payday lending (APRs ~400%) and protects consumers from high-cost debt traps.⁵⁸ | Provides a clear “red line” against usury; acts as social insurance against financial shocks.⁶¹ | May restrict access to legal credit for high-risk borrowers, pushing them to unregulated markets.⁶¹ | High |
Expanded Funding for CDFIs & Credit Unions | Increasing federal investment in and support for mission-driven community financial institutions. | CUs and CDFIs offer lower rates, better service, and improve borrower outcomes (credit scores, bankruptcy risk).⁶⁴ | Strengthens a community-based financial ecosystem; provides an affordable alternative to predatory lenders.⁶⁸ | These institutions have limited scale compared to the mainstream banking sector; requires sustained public investment. | Medium |
Financial Counseling & Education | Providing access to and promoting nonprofit credit counseling and financial literacy programs. | Counseled consumers show significant reductions in debt and improved financial behaviors.⁸¹ | Empowers individuals with skills to manage finances; addresses behavioral components of debt.⁷⁸ | Insufficient to solve systemic problems; can function as “victim-blaming” if not paired with structural reform.⁸⁶ | Low (as a standalone solution) |
Cited works
71% 71% - The Heller School - Brandeis University, https://heller.brandeis.edu/iere/pdfs/racial-wealth-equity/asset-integration/middle-to-shaky-ground.pdf
Why Debt has Transformed the American Middle Class - Beyond …, https://www.beyondfinance.com/blog/why-debt-has-transformed-the-american-middle-class/
The Middle Class Is Saving Less, and High-Cost Credit Card Debt …, https://www.chicagofed.org/research/content-areas/mobility/policy-brief-middle-class-saving
How much wealth does the American middle class have? | USAFacts, https://usafacts.org/answers/how-much-wealth-does-the-american-middle-class-have/country/united-states/
Credit Card Blues: The Middle Class and the Hidden Costs of Easy Credit - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4707673/
Cost of Living and Wage Stagnation in the United States, 1979-2015 | Cato Institute, https://www.cato.org/projects/humanprogress/cost-of-living
Wage Stagnation in Nine Charts | Economic Policy Institute, https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/
Homeownership is getting unaffordable for the middle class - Bankrate, https://www.bankrate.com/mortgages/homeownership-unafforable-for-the-middle-class/
Wage Stagnation Has Made “Minimal Quality of Life” Out of Reach …, https://truthout.org/articles/wage-stagnation-has-made-minimal-quality-of-life-out-of-reach-for-most-in-us/
Healthcare debts in the United States: a silent fight - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11918610/
Debt and shame: Why millions in China feel trapped and alone - despite a ‘strong’ economy, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/debt-and-shame-why-millions-in-china-feel-trapped-and-alone-despite-a-strong-economy/articleshow/122764778.cms
The American Dream Is Not a Coin Flip, and Wages Have Not Stagnated, https://cosm.aei.org/the-american-dream-is-not-a-coin-flip-and-wages-have-not-stagnated/
New labor market data suggest that U.S. wage growth may be cooling too much, https://equitablegrowth.org/new-labor-market-data-suggest-that-u-s-wage-growth-may-be-cooling-too-much/
Here’s where it’s toughest for the middle class to find an affordable …, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/real-estate-home-buying-affordability-gap-middle-class-where-its-worst/
Housing and Community Development Policy | Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/supporting-working-families-policy-evidence-and-data/housing-and-community-development-policy
Full article: The uncoupling of house prices and mortgage debt: towards wealth-driven housing market dynamics - Taylor & Francis Online, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19491247.2023.2170542
What Happens When Housing Prices Go Down (because they are)? - Strong Towns, https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2025/7/21/what-happens-when-housing-prices-go-down-because-they-are
Increasingly Debt-Strapped Consumers Concerned About Rising Housing-Related Costs, https://www.fanniemae.com/research-and-insights/increasingly-debt-strapped-consumers-concerned-about-rising-housing-related-costs
Americans’ Challenges with Health Care Costs | KFF, https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/americans-challenges-with-health-care-costs/
The burden of medical debt in the United States - Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states/
Medical Debt Hits the Heart of the Middle Class - Third Way, https://www.thirdway.org/report/medical-debt-hits-the-heart-of-the-middle-class
Who’s carrying medical debt in America? More middle class patients than rich or poor ones, https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/who-s-carrying-medical-debt-in-america-more-middle-class-patients-than-rich-or-poor-ones
State Protections Against Medical Debt | Commonwealth Fund, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2025/jul/state-protections-against-medical-debt-look-policies-across-us
The US Medical Debt Crisis: Catastrophic Costs of Insufficient Health Coverage, https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/medical-debt/
Relieving Student Debt & Growing Our Middle Class - Joint Economic Committee, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/democrats/2023/8/student-debt-growing-our-middle-class
How Does Student Debt Affect the Economy? - Peterson Foundation, https://www.pgpf.org/article/how-does-student-debt-affect-the-economy/
Financial Stress, Race, and Student Debt during the Great Recession - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10373449/
The Impact of Student Debt on the Low-Wage Workforce | WorkRise Network, https://www.workrisenetwork.org/working-knowledge/impact-student-debt-low-wage-workforce
RELEASE: Raising the Minimum Wage Would Be an Investment in Growing the Middle Class - Center for American Progress, https://www.americanprogress.org/press/release-raising-the-minimum-wage-would-be-an-investment-in-growing-the-middle-class/
Equity implications of the unchanged Federal minimum wage since 2009 - RISE, https://rise.vcu.edu/news/news-posts/equity-implications-of-the-unchanged-federal-minimum-wage-since-2009.html
How Does a Federal Minimum Wage Hike Affect Aggregate Household Spending?, https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2013/august-313
The Effects on Employment and Family Income of Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage, https://www.edwardconard.com/macro-roundup/cbo-analysis-of-a-15-an-hour-minimum-wage-estimates-a-reduction-in-employment-by-1-3-million-workers-resulting-in-a-net-impact-of-lower-real-household-income-overall/?view=detail
The Effects on Employment and Family Income of Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage - Congressional Budget Office, https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2019-07/CBO-55410-MinimumWage2019.pdf
How Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage Could Affect …, https://www.cbo.gov/publication/55681
Minimum Wage Increases and Vacancies - Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/7594/rwp20-22kudlyaktascituzemen.pdf
The Distributional Impact of the Minimum Wage in the Short and Long Run, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30294/w30294.pdf
A Living Wage? The Effects of the Minimum Wage on the Distribution of Wages, the Distribution of Family Earnings, and Poverty. - David Card, https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/minwage%20fam.pdf
The impacts of the 2021 expanded child tax credit on family …, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-impacts-of-the-2021-expanded-child-tax-credit-on-family-employment-nutrition-and-financial-well-being/
The impacts of the 2021 expanded child tax credit on family employment, nutrition, and financial well-being: - Brookings Institution, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Child-Tax-Credit-Report-Final_Updated.pdf
Effects of Reforms of the Home Mortgage Interest Deduction by Income Group and by State | Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/86296/2001015-effects-of-reforms-of-the-home-mortgage-interest-deduction-by-income-group-and-by-state.pdf
A post-COVID plan for the middle class: Tax wealth not work and provide scholarships for service | Brookings, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/a-post-covid-plan-for-the-middle-class-tax-wealth-not-work-and-provide-scholarships-for-service/
Once the tax bill is paid for, low- and middle-income households will be worse off, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/once-the-tax-bill-is-paid-for-low-and-middle-income-households-will-be-worse-off/
Housing affordability | Urban Institute - Upward Mobility Initiative, https://upward-mobility.urban.org/framework/neighborhoods/affordability
Federal housing programs and policies | Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/tags/federal-housing-programs-and-policies
Housing affordability - Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/tags/housing-affordability
A Road Map to Address America’s Housing Crisis | Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/projects/road-map-address-americas-housing-crisis
Evaluating Inclusionary Zoning Policies - Local Housing Solutions, https://www.localhousingsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Evaluating-Inclusionary-Zoning-Policies_V3.pdf
How Can Zoning Policy Design Promote Affordable Housing?, https://housingmatters.urban.org/research-summary/how-can-zoning-policy-design-promote-affordable-housing
The Effects of Inclusionary Zoning on Local Housing Markets: Lessons from the San Francisco, Washington DC and Suburban Boston Areas - NYU Furman Center, https://furmancenter.org/files/publications/IZPolicyBrief_LowRes.pdf
Housing And Health: The Role Of Inclusionary Zoning, https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/briefs/housing-and-health-role-inclusionary-zoning
How Much Can Downpayment Assistance Close Homeownership Gaps for Black and Hispanic Households?, https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/research/files/harvard_jchs_downpayment_assistance_mccue_2023.pdf
Expanding Down Payment Assistance Awareness Could Help More People Afford a Home, https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/expanding-down-payment-assistance-awareness-could-help-more-people-afford-home
An Essential Role for Down Payment Assistance in Closing America’s Racial Homeownership and Wealth Gaps | Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/104134/an-essential-role-for-down-payment-assistance-in-closing-americas-racial-homeownership-and-wealth-gaps_0.pdf
Spotlight on Research: Down Payment Assistance Plays Critical Role in Affordable Homeownership - Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, https://www.philadelphiafed.org/community-development/spotlight-on-research-down-payment-assistance-plays-critical-role-in-affordable-homeownership
States Continue to Enact Protections for Patients with Medical Debt - Commonwealth Fund, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2024/states-continue-enact-protections-patients-medical-debt
Health Reform - Commonwealth Fund, https://www.commonwealthfund.org/health-reform
College Affordability and Student Debt - Center for American Progress, https://www.americanprogress.org/topic/college-affordability-and-student-debt/
The History, Use, and Purpose of the 36% Interest Rate Cap, https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/IAC%20071414%20Item%206%20why36pct.pdf
What is a payday loan? | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-payday-loan-en-1567/
rate cap | Consumer Finance Monitor, https://www.consumerfinancemonitor.com/tag/rate-cap/
Interest Rate Caps on Credit Cards - Congress.gov, https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/PDF/IF12861/IF12861.4.pdf
The Impacts of Individual and Household Debt on Health and Well Being, https://www.apha.org/policy-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-briefs/policy-database/2022/01/07/the-impacts-of-individual-and-household-debt-on-health-and-well-being
The Effects on Consumers From State-Imposed Regulation of The Payday Loan Market - AALS Annual Meeting, https://am.aals.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/12/AM20LawEconomicsMillerPaper.pdf
Empowering the underserved: How credit unions are driving …, https://www.americascreditunions.org/blogs/americas-credit-unions/empowering-underserved-how-credit-unions-are-driving-financial
Credit Unions: Prospects and Challenges - IMF eLibrary, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/downloadpdf/book/9781616352653/ch011.xml
Credit Unions - Benefits, Types & Regulations - Debt.org, https://www.debt.org/credit/unions/
CONSUMER FINANCE OUTCOMES OF BANKING WITH CREDIT UNIONS - Content Delivery Network (CDN), https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northeastern.edu/dist/6/2602/files/2024/07/BCU-July2024.pdf
Credit unions should focus on the middle class - R Street Institute, https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/credit-unions-should-focus-on-the-middle-class/
Taking Stock of Community Development Financial Institutions …, https://www.richmondfed.org/region_communities/regional_data_analysis/regional_matters/2025/stock_of_community_development_financial_institutions
Why Community Development Financial Institutions are Essential for Community Health and Prosperity - Build Healthy Places Network, https://buildhealthyplaces.org/sharing-knowledge/blogs/video-blog-series/why-community-development-financial-institutions-are-essential-for-community-health-and-prosperity/
The Role of Community Development Financial Institutions in Home Ownership Finance October 2008, https://www.cdfifund.gov/system/files/documents/the-role-of-community-development-financial.pdf
The importance of advocating for CDFIs: Strengthening financial access for communities, https://www.cuinsight.com/the-importance-of-advocating-for-cdfis-strengthening-financial-access-for-communities/
Community Development Financial Institutions | County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/strategies-and-solutions/what-works-for-health/strategies/community-development-financial-institutions
CDFI Success Stories, https://cdfi.org/success-stories/
Financing community growth and sparking prosperity: Five housing projects CDFI financing has made possible, https://smartgrowthamerica.org/financing-community-growth-and-sparking-prosperity-five-housing-projects-cdfi-financing-has-made-possible/
CDFIs emerge as key partners in improving community health, https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2014/cdfis-emerge-as-key-partners-in-improving-community-health
Risk and Efficiency among CDFIs: A Statistical Evaluation using Multiple Methods, https://www.cdfifund.gov/system/files/documents/risk-and-efficiency-among-cdfis-report.pdf
Unpacking the role of financial literacy in the debt-mental health nexus: evidence from China, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12092232/
(PDF) The Effect of Financial Planning on Consumer Debt Management: The Role of Financial Literacy, Self-Efficacy, and Financial Motivation - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379441562_The_Effect_of_Financial_Planning_on_Consumer_Debt_Management_The_Role_of_Financial_Literacy_Self-Efficacy_and_Financial_Motivation
Financial education for young people can help their parents | World …, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/07/financial-education-students-to-parents/
Benefits of Working With a Nonprofit for Debt Management - Consumer Credit of Minnesota, https://www.ccofminnesota.org/about/blog/benefits-of-working-with-a-nonprofit-for-debt-management
Nonprofit Credit Counselors vs. Debt Relief Companies - Discover, https://www.discover.com/credit-cards/card-smarts/nonprofit-credit-counselors-vs-debt-relief-companies/
Is Credit Counseling Effective for Managing Debt? - Money Fit, https://www.moneyfit.org/credit-counseling-effectiveness/
The Impact of Credit Counseling on Consumer Outcomes: Evidence from a National Demonstration Program - FDIC, https://www.fdic.gov/media/168441
The Impact of Credit Counseling on Consumer Outcomes: Evidence from a National Demonstration Program, https://gflec.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Roll-Stephen-and-Moulton-Stephanie-The-Impact-of-Credit-Counseling-on-Consumer-Outcomes.pdf
“You’re to Blame”: How Financial Literacy Curricula Make Students Financially Illiterate, https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/youre-to-blame-how-financial-literacy-curricula-make-students-financially-illiterate/
Against Financial Literacy Education - Penn Carey Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1198&context=faculty_scholarship
How will first-time homebuyer assistance affect housing markets? - Brookings Institution, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-will-first-time-homebuyer-assistance-affect-the-housing-markets/