Global K-12 Artificial Intelligence Education Market: A Strategic Analysis of Policy, Pedagogy, and Future Trajectories

Executive Summary

The global K-12 (Kindergarten to 12th Grade) Artificial Intelligence (AI) education industry is at a historic inflection point. It represents not just a technological innovation, but a profound paradigm shift in education, heralding a fundamental reshaping of teaching, learning, and assessment. This report aims to provide a comprehensive, in-depth analysis of the global development status of this emerging industry. Through a strategic analysis of market dynamics, geopolitical policies, pedagogical applications, the corporate ecosystem, core challenges, and future trends, it seeks to provide a basis for decision-making for policymakers, investors, and educational leaders.

The core findings of the report are as follows:

1. Explosive Market Growth, But Inconsistent Forecast Data: The global AI in education market is expanding rapidly, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 30%, and is projected to reach tens of billions of dollars by 2030. However, there are significant discrepancies in the forecast data from different research institutions, reflecting the market’s early, vaguely defined, and highly dynamic stage. This uncertainty is both a risk and an opportunity.

2. Significant Divergence in Geopolitical Strategies: Global AI education policies exhibit three distinct models. China has adopted a top-down, state-mandated model, integrating AI education into the national basic education system through compulsory courses. The goal is to rapidly cultivate a generation of “AI natives” and seize a leading position in global technology. The United States employs a decentralized, incentive-driven model, relying on federal guidance, public-private partnerships, and state-level autonomy. This reflects its market-oriented and decentralized tradition but has also led to a fragmented implementation and a “Wild West” scenario with inconsistent standards. The European Union promotes a values-driven framework model, emphasizing ethics, fairness, and digital citizenship, seeking a balance between technological development and human rights protection. The competition among these three models is, in essence, a contest of different governance philosophies in the global tech education arena.

3. The Core Conflict in Pedagogical Applications: The application of AI in the classroom is mainly concentrated in three areas: personalized adaptive learning, automation of administrative tasks, and AI literacy education. However, there is a clear cognitive dissonance among the main stakeholders (students, teachers, and parents). Students generally view AI as a “productivity tool” to improve homework efficiency; teachers tend to use it to reduce administrative burdens like lesson planning and grading, while being highly vigilant about student “cheating”; and the “pedagogical revolution” aimed at fostering higher-order thinking, as envisioned by policymakers and technology advocates, has not yet become mainstream.

4. Teacher Training is the Biggest Bottleneck to Industry Development: Despite massive investments in technology and capital, the AI proficiency of teachers has become the core constraint on the entire industry’s development. More than half of K-12 teachers have never received any formal AI training, and teacher education programs are severely lagging. This “human bottleneck” prevents advanced AI education tools from realizing their full potential in the classroom, posing the greatest execution risk for the entire industry.

5. The Equity Gap is Widening: Instead of becoming a promoter of educational equity, the proliferation of AI risks exacerbating inequality. Well-resourced school districts are far ahead in AI tool procurement and teacher training, while high-poverty districts lag significantly behind. This “rich-get-richer” vicious cycle is transforming AI from a potential equalizer into a powerful amplifier of inequality.

6. Future Outlook: Human-Machine Collaboration and a New Wave of Challenges: In the long run, the ultimate goal of K-12 AI education is not to train coders, but to cultivate future citizens who can work collaboratively with AI and possess “21st-century skills” such as critical thinking, creativity, and empathy. At the same time, the integration of AI with immersive technologies like the metaverse heralds the next leap in the educational experience, but may also bring more severe challenges in terms of cost and equity.

In summary, the global K-12 AI education industry is reshaping the future of education at an unprecedented speed and scale. However, its development trajectory will depend not only on technological progress but also on how we address profound social challenges such as teacher capacity, equity, and governance. The countries, regions, and companies that can effectively solve these problems will assume a leading position in the future global education and labor markets.

Part 1: The Global K-12 Artificial Intelligence Education Market Landscape

1.1 Market Size and Growth Forecasts: An Explosive but Inconsistent Outlook

The global education sector is undergoing a “seismic shift” driven by artificial intelligence.¹ This is not merely a simple overlay of technology but a reimagining of the fundamental models of teaching and learning. AI is evolving from an auxiliary tool into a foundational layer of the global education system, with applications spanning personalized learning, administrative automation, student assessment, and new interactive teaching models.¹ This fundamental transformation is fueling the explosive growth of the AI in education market.

However, conducting a precise quantitative analysis of this rapidly developing market is extremely challenging. Reports from various market research firms show significant discrepancies in market size and growth rate forecasts, which itself reveals the market’s early-stage, ill-defined nature.

• Macro Market Forecasts:

  • One report predicts the total global AI in education market will grow from $3.79 billion in 2022 to $20.54 billion in 2027, at a staggering compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 45.6%.¹

  • Another report estimates the market was valued at $4.17 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach $53.02 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 43.8%.²

  • Yet another analysis indicates the market will grow from $4.7 billion in 2024 to $26.43 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 37.68%.³

• K-12 Segment Data:

  • An analysis specifically targeting the K-12 sector shows the global K-12 AI education market size was $1.8392 billion in 2024 and is projected to increase to $9.8142 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 32.2% .

These data discrepancies stem from multiple factors. First, institutions define “AI in education” differently; some may focus on software and platforms, while others include smart hardware and administrative systems. Second, the market’s high dynamism makes data collection and forecasting models struggle to keep up with rapid technological and application iterations. This divergence in forecasts is a true reflection of the market’s early exploratory phase. For investors and policymakers, this signifies a market full of opportunities, but also one accompanied by high uncertainty and risk.

Table 1: Comparison of Global AI in K-12 Education Market Growth Forecasts

Research Firm	Report Year	Market Scope	Base Year & Size (USD)	Forecast Year & Size (USD)	CAGR
TMR ¹	2023	Global AI in Education	2022: 3.79 Billion	2027: 20.54 Billion	45.6%
Maximize Market Research ²	2024	Global AI in Education	2023: 4.17 Billion	2030: 53.02 Billion	43.8%
Market Research Future ³	2024	Global AI in Education	2024: 4.7 Billion	2032: 26.43 Billion	37.68%
Grand View Research	2024	Global K-12 AI Education	2024: 1.839 Billion	2030: 9.814 Billion	32.2%

Note: The data discrepancies in the table above reflect differences in market scope (e.g., inclusion of higher education and corporate training) and statistical methodologies among various firms.

1.2 Core Growth Drivers and Market Dynamics

The forces driving the high-speed growth of the K-12 AI education market are multidimensional and interconnected, collectively forming a powerful development engine.

• Urgent Demand for Personalized Education: This is the most fundamental driver. The traditional “one-size-fits-all” teaching model can no longer meet diverse learning needs. AI technology makes large-scale, deep-level personalized learning possible.¹ AI adaptive learning platforms can analyze a student’s learning progress and style in real-time, dynamically adjusting content and difficulty, thereby significantly enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes.⁴ This demand comes from educators, parents, and institutions, forming the market’s base.

• Strong Support from Governments and Venture Capital: Governments and private sectors worldwide are investing heavily in the Education Technology (EdTech) sector. For example, EdTech investment in the U.S. has surpassed $3 billion in recent years, the EU has launched its Digital Education Action Plan, and India has released its National Education Policy 2020.⁵ These government-level strategic plans provide policy guarantees and financial incentives for AI education infrastructure and application. Meanwhile, the active participation of venture capital firms, corporations, and non-profit incubators indicates the capital market’s confidence in the long-term potential of AI in education.¹

• Improved Operational Efficiency and Alleviation of Teacher Pressure: The application of AI in education is not just about improving teaching quality; to a large extent, it is also about solving the operational crises facing education systems. Globally, teachers face issues of heavy workloads, cumbersome administrative tasks, and staff shortages.¹ AI tools can automate repetitive tasks like grading homework, scheduling classes, and generating reports, freeing teachers from tedious administrative work to focus more time and energy on valuable teaching interactions and student counseling.⁶ This direct improvement in teacher efficiency has become a key selling point for AI products to quickly enter schools.

• Maturity and Proliferation of Technological Foundations: Technological advancements have laid the groundwork for the widespread application of AI in education. The popularization of the Cloud Deployment model has significantly lowered the cost and technical barriers for schools to deploy and maintain AI systems, allowing even resource-limited institutions to use advanced educational tools.² At the core technology level, the development of
  Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) is particularly crucial . Advances in NLP have made intelligent tutoring systems, chatbots, and automated writing assessment possible, with the demand for virtual support in K-12 driving the rapid growth of NLP technology.²

• Normalization of Hybrid Learning in the Post-Pandemic Era: The COVID-19 pandemic has permanently changed the educational landscape, making a hybrid model combining online and offline learning the new normal.¹ This model places higher demands on the flexibility and continuity of teaching. AI-driven virtual tutors, automated assessment systems, and student engagement tracking tools can seamlessly connect different learning scenarios, providing strong technical support for hybrid learning.

1.3 In-Depth Regional Market Analysis: A World of Different Priorities

The growth of the global K-12 AI education market is not evenly distributed. Different regions exhibit distinct characteristics due to their varying economic foundations, policy orientations, and cultural backgrounds.

• North America: As the current largest market globally, North America dominates with its strong technological prowess, substantial capital investment, and well-developed infrastructure . Tech giants like Microsoft, Google, and IBM are headquartered here and promote AI applications through their vast educational ecosystems.¹ The region’s high acceptance and early adoption of cutting-edge technology make it a bellwether for market development.

• Asia-Pacific (APAC): This is the world’s fastest-growing market.¹ A massive student population, a strong willingness to invest in education, and government-led digital transformation strategies are collectively driving the region’s rapid development.
  China is the leader in the APAC market, with its market size and policy intensity at the forefront globally.³ Meanwhile,
  India, with its huge youth population and government initiatives like “Digital India,” is predicted to have one of the highest CAGRs in the coming years . Countries like South Korea are also actively promoting digital learning initiatives.

• Europe: The European market follows North America and APAC, with countries actively integrating AI into their national digital education strategies.¹ Unlike the U.S. and China, which are vying for technological leadership, Europe is more focused on establishing a regulated, fair, and human-centric AI education ecosystem. For example,
  Germany’s “National AI Strategy” pledges to invest €5 billion by 2025 for AI implementation, with a significant portion flowing into education through the “DigitalPakt Schule” program, making it the largest AI education market in Europe.⁹ However, Europe also faces unique challenges, namely the tension between policy promotion and public opinion. For instance, in Germany, over 60% of the population holds a negative view on using AI in schools, which creates resistance to policy implementation.⁹

Part 2: The Game of Three Strategies: A Comparative Analysis of US, China, and EU Policies

The development of global K-12 AI education is not purely a technological or market-driven phenomenon; it has become deeply integrated into the grand narrative of geopolitics. As the world’s three major powers, China, the United States, and the European Union have taken distinctly different policy paths that not only shape their domestic industry ecosystems but also signal the future direction of global technology governance and educational philosophies. These are not just policies about education; they are strategic layouts for future national competitiveness.

2.1 China’s Mandate: The Top-Down, Centrally-Planned Model

China’s AI education strategy is characterized by its high degree of central planning, clear objectives, and strong execution. It is a typical top-down, state-mandated model, with the core objective of serving the nation’s grand strategy to become a world-leading AI innovation hub by 2030.¹⁰ This strategy was not developed overnight but is the result of years of policy groundwork, marked by the 2017 State Council’s “New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan,” which first explicitly proposed setting up AI-related courses in primary and secondary schools.¹⁰

• Core Policy and Timeline: In April 2025, China’s Ministry of Education issued a guidance opinion, announcing that starting from September 1, 2025, AI general education will be implemented in all primary and secondary schools nationwide, with the capital city of Beijing serving as a pilot city.¹² The mandatory and nationwide nature of this policy is unprecedented globally.

• Curriculum Structure and Requirements: The policy stipulates that primary and secondary school students must receive no less than 8 hours of AI course education per academic year.¹² The curriculum system is designed to follow a “spiral-up” principle, setting differentiated learning objectives for students of different age groups ¹²:

  • Elementary School (ages 6-12): Focuses on experience and interest cultivation. Through interaction with smart devices, robot programming, and sensory learning, students perceive the value of AI technologies (like voice recognition and image classification) and develop an initial understanding of and curiosity about AI.¹²

  • Middle School: The focus shifts to practical applications. The curriculum will combine real-life case studies to teach skills like data analysis and problem-solving, helping students understand and apply AI technology.¹²

  • High School: Focuses on advanced applications, innovative projects, and ethical deliberation. Students are encouraged to participate in project-based learning, develop more complex AI applications, and delve into the social and ethical issues brought about by AI, fostering both technical skills and an innovative spirit.¹²

• Implementation and Support: To ensure the policy’s implementation, the Chinese government has adopted several supporting measures. AI education can be offered as a standalone course or integrated into existing subjects like science and information technology.¹² The government is vigorously promoting a “teacher-student-machine” collaborative learning model and encouraging schools to partner with enterprises and research institutions to establish practical training bases.¹² Furthermore, the state is building a “National Smart Education Platform for Primary and Secondary Schools” to coordinate high-quality educational resources and is organizing the compilation of specialized AI textbooks to ensure the authoritativeness and universality of teaching content.¹²

• Market-Driving Effect: This national-level strategy has directly created and regulated a massive domestic market. It is predicted that by 2030, China’s AI in education market will reach $3.3 billion, with a CAGR of 34.6%.⁸ The Ministry of Education plans to invest approximately 2 trillion RMB (about $275 billion) in education-related projects in the coming years, a significant portion of which will be used to support EdTech and AI education development.¹⁵

2.2 America’s Puzzle: The Incentive-Driven, Decentralized Model

In stark contrast to China’s centralized model, the U.S. AI education strategy is highly decentralized, bottom-up, and market-driven. The United States has no national curriculum standards, and educational decision-making power lies primarily with states and local school districts.¹⁰ This institutional tradition has led to a “Wild West” state in the AI education field, characterized by a lack of unified planning and inconsistent standards.¹⁷

• Core Policy Tool: The federal government’s role is more that of a guide and an incentivizer than a commander. Its key policy tool is the Executive Order on Advancing Artificial Intelligence Education for American Youth, signed in April 2025.¹³ The executive order aims to enhance AI literacy among students nationwide, but its notable feature is that it
  creates no new dedicated funding, instead emphasizing the use of existing resources and mechanisms.¹³

• Key Initiatives:

  • Establishment of a White House AI Education Task Force: Led by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, in collaboration with the Departments of Education, Labor, Energy, and others, to coordinate federal-level AI education efforts.¹⁸

  • Promotion of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): The core strategy of the executive order is to encourage federal agencies to cooperate with leading AI industry companies, academic institutions, and non-profit organizations to jointly develop AI literacy and critical thinking educational resources for K-12 students.¹⁸

  • Utilization of Existing Grant Programs: Directs the Department of Education and other agencies to prioritize support for AI-related training and applications within existing discretionary grant programs, such as those for teacher training.¹⁸

  • Hosting a “Presidential AI Challenge”: To incentivize and showcase student and teacher achievements in the AI field through a national competition, promoting technology adoption.¹⁸

• Fragmentation of State-Level Action: Due to the lack of mandatory federal requirements, the pace and direction of actions vary among states. As of 2024, 17 states have passed some form of AI-related legislation, but the content differs widely.²⁰ For example, California and Virginia have established task forces to study the impact of AI; Connecticut and Florida have allocated funds for high school AI pilot programs; while only Tennessee explicitly requires school districts to develop rules for teacher and student use of AI.²⁰ This “puzzle-like” policy landscape is a direct reflection of the American tradition of local control in education.

2.3 Europe’s Framework: The Collaborative, Ethics-First Model

Europe’s AI education strategy takes a third path, characterized by a values-driven approach that emphasizes the need to uphold the principles of human rights, democracy, and the rule of law while embracing technology.²¹ Compared to the U.S. and China’s competition for technological dominance, Europe is more concerned with the social impact of AI, committed to building a responsible, inclusive, and trustworthy AI education ecosystem. This philosophy is embedded in the EU’s “AI Act” and the “Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027”.²²

• Core Policy Tool: The cornerstone of the European model is the draft “AI Literacy Framework for Primary and Secondary Education,” jointly prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Commission.²² It is not a mandatory curriculum but a guiding document intended to provide reference and support for member states in integrating AI literacy education in classrooms, curricula, and communities. The final version of the framework is expected to be released in 2026.

• Framework Structure and Philosophy: Titled “Empowering Learners for the Age of AI,” the framework divides AI literacy into four practical domains: Engaging with AI, Creating with AI, Managing AI, and Designing AI.²² Its core philosophy goes beyond mere technical skills training, placing a high emphasis on ethics, inclusion, and social responsibility. The framework encourages students to:

  • Question AI-generated results.

  • Evaluate biases present in algorithms.

  • Weigh the social and environmental impacts of AI use.

  • Understand the limitations of AI and how it reflects human choices in training data, design, and deployment.²²

• Member State Action and Social Tension: Guided by the EU framework, member states are also taking active steps. As mentioned earlier, Germany has committed €5 billion to its national AI strategy, with education as a key area.⁹ However, the European model also faces a unique challenge: the tension between government ambitions and public skepticism. Surveys in countries like Ireland show that many parents and teachers feel unprepared to guide children in using AI safely, calling for more information and training . This emphasis on stakeholder voices also makes the European policymaking process more cautious and complex.

These three distinct strategic paths are, in fact, manifestations of three different geopolitical philosophies. The Chinese model places national will and strategic goals first, pursuing efficiency and speed to win future technological dominance through the reshaping of the education system. The American model believes in market forces and local autonomy, trusting that free competition and public-private partnerships can unleash the greatest innovative vitality. The European model, on the other hand, takes human rights and social well-being as the fundamental premise for technological application, attempting to find a middle way between innovation and regulation. K-12 AI education has thus become a microcosm reflecting the fundamental thinking of these three powers on how to shape the relationship between humans and technology. Its long-term success or failure will have a profound impact on global technology standards, labor skills, and even future governance models.

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of US, China, and EU AI Education Policies

Dimension	China	United States	European Union
Governance Model	Centralized, top-down state mandate	Federal guidance, decentralized model led by states and local districts	Transnational framework guidance, collaborative model with member state autonomy
Curriculum Status	Mandatory national curriculum, implemented from 2025	No national unified curriculum, decided by states and districts	Guiding literacy framework (draft), non-mandatory
Core Objective	Cultivate AI talent to win global tech competition advantage	Promote AI literacy, develop an AI-driven workforce	Cultivate responsible digital citizens, protect human rights and ethics
Funding Mechanism	Large-scale national financial investment and strategic projects	Reliance on existing federal grants and public-private partnerships	Combination of EU funds and member state national budgets
Main Challenges	Quality and depth of curriculum implementation, avoiding formalism	Extreme regional disparities, lack of unified standards	Slow policy implementation, challenges with public acceptance
Source	¹²	¹⁰	²¹

Part 3: The AI-Integrated Classroom: Trends, Applications, and Stakeholder Perspectives

As AI technology moves from concept to practice, it is profoundly changing the face of the K-12 classroom. From teaching content to assessment methods, and from teacher-student interaction, AI’s penetration is ubiquitous. However, the different participants—students, teachers, and parents—have vastly different feelings and expectations about this transformation, creating a complex and tense picture.

3.1 The Rise of AI Literacy: A New Core Competency

The most significant trend in K-12 AI education today is the shift in focus from “teaching with AI” to “teaching about AI.” AI Literacy is no longer seen as the exclusive domain of computer science but has been elevated to the status of a “foundational skill” on par with reading, writing, and arithmetic .

• The Meaning of Literacy: AI literacy is much more than learning how to use AI tools. It requires students to deeply understand the basic principles of AI, how it works, its capabilities, and its potential risks.²⁴ According to a UNESCO analysis of global AI curricula, a complete AI literacy curriculum typically includes three pillars:
  AI foundations (such as algorithms and data literacy), ethics and social impact (such as bias, privacy, and fairness), and understanding, using, and developing AI technologies .

• Core Skill Development: The core objective of AI literacy education is to cultivate students’ critical thinking. Students need to learn to scrutinize and evaluate AI-generated content, not passively accept it.²⁴ They must understand that AI’s output “reflects data, not truth” . Because AI-generated content often carries an aura of technical authority and may appear objective and fair while containing serious errors, biases, or misleading information, developing this critical review capability is particularly important.²⁴ This includes identifying how algorithmic bias can embed social discrimination into seemingly neutral systems and understanding its potential harm to vulnerable groups.²⁴

• Global Consensus: Making AI literacy an educational priority is one of the few commonalities among the three major strategic models of China, the US, and the EU. Whether it’s China’s policy of “fostering virtue through education” and “developing literacy” ¹⁴, the emphasis on “AI literacy and critical thinking” in the US executive order ¹⁸, or the European framework’s focus on “responsible use of AI” ²², all point to the same goal: to cultivate the next generation capable of wisely and prudently navigating AI technology.

3.2 The Personalization Engine: Adaptive Learning in Practice

If AI literacy is the “new content” of teaching, then personalized adaptive learning is the most central application of AI technology in the “new method” of teaching. This is currently the most common and potentially most transformative application of AI in the classroom.¹

• Core Mechanism: AI-driven adaptive learning platforms build a unique learner profile for each student by tracking and analyzing their learning behavior data in real-time (such as response speed, accuracy, help-seeking frequency, etc.). Based on this, the platform can dynamically adjust the difficulty, sequence, and presentation of teaching content, planning the optimal learning path for each student.⁴

• Main Application Forms:

  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS): This is a typical representative of adaptive learning. AI acts as a 24/7, one-on-one virtual tutor that can provide immediate, precise tutoring and feedback on students’ weak points .

  • Automated Assessment and Feedback: AI greatly enhances assessment efficiency. It can not only quickly grade objective questions but also score subjective questions like essays by analyzing text for coherence, relevance, and logic, and provide detailed feedback.⁶ This not only saves teachers a lot of time but also allows students to understand their learning status more promptly.

  • Content Delivery and Generation: In the market, content delivery systems account for the largest share of revenue in AI education applications.³ AI is also used to create “smart content,” such as condensing thick textbooks into easy-to-understand summaries to help students quickly grasp core concepts.²⁶

  • Gamified Learning: Some platforms use AI to gamify classroom management and the learning process. For example, the Classcraft platform tracks students’ classroom behavior with AI and gives rewards in a gamified way, thereby stimulating students’ learning motivation and maintaining a positive classroom atmosphere.²⁵

• Empowering Teacher Professional Development: AI not only serves students but also becomes a “smart coach” for teachers. By analyzing classroom recordings, AI can provide teachers with quantitative data and feedback on their teaching pace, questioning techniques, instruction clarity, and student engagement. This objective, data-driven feedback helps teachers conduct in-depth self-reflection, thereby improving their teaching strategies and professional capabilities.⁶

3.3 Voices from the Front Lines: The Conflict of Three Perspectives

Although the blueprint for AI education is grand, a closer look at the classroom front lines reveals deep contradictions and disconnects in the attitudes and usage of AI among the three core stakeholders: students, teachers, and parents.

• Students: Pragmatic Early Adopters. The student population is the fastest and most widespread adopter of AI technology. One survey showed that as high as 89% of students admit to using tools like ChatGPT to assist with homework.²⁷ Their motivation is highly pragmatic: primarily for
  research, summarizing information, and generating study materials, with the core goal of improving learning efficiency.²⁶ Interestingly, students are more inclined than teachers to believe that AI can create a more equitable education system (41% vs. 33%).²⁶

• Teachers: Skeptical Pragmatists. Teachers’ attitudes toward AI are extremely complex and contradictory. On one hand, they acknowledge the practical value of AI in their work, with 77% of teachers believing AI is helpful for lesson planning and administrative tasks.²⁷ As their familiarity with the tools increases, their attitudes tend to become more positive, with nearly half of teachers using ChatGPT weekly.²⁸ On the other hand, they are full of doubt and distrust regarding student use of AI. As many as 70% of teachers believe that students using AI for homework constitutes
  cheating or plagiarism.²⁷ Many teachers’ primary task is to prevent student cheating, rather than exploring how to use AI for innovative teaching.²⁹ Behind this contradictory mindset is a widespread lack of training and anxiety about unknown technology .

• Parents: Worried Outsiders. Compared to students and teachers, the parent community holds the most negative views on AI education. A staggering 70% of parents believe that AI has no positive impact on their children’s education.²⁷ Their biggest worry is that over-reliance on AI will harm their children’s
  critical thinking and independent learning abilities.²⁸ At the same time, many parents feel they lack the relevant knowledge and skills to guide their children in using AI correctly and safely, and generally feel anxious and unprepared .

This misalignment of the three perspectives reveals a profound problem: in current AI education practices, there is a fundamental disconnect between “productivity vs. pedagogy.” Students are pursuing an increase in personal learning “productivity” (completing tasks faster); teachers are pursuing an increase in teaching management “efficiency” (reducing workload); while policymakers and tech idealists advocate for a “pedagogical” revolution aimed at promoting deep understanding and higher-order thinking. The inconsistency of these three goals is the root of the various conflicts and challenges that arise when AI education is implemented in the classroom. School policies often waver in this tension, ultimately adopting vague “guardrail” strategies rather than clear strategic guidance .

Furthermore, the proliferation of AI is fundamentally shaking the traditional academic assessment system. When students can easily use generative AI to complete an essay, the effectiveness of traditional assessment methods like homework and closed-book exams is challenged as never before. This “academic integrity crisis” triggered by AI is forcing the education system to undergo a profound reflection: what should we be assessing? Is it the final text product, or the student’s thinking ability in the process of research, deliberation, and information integration? This pressure may inadvertently become a catalyst, pushing assessment methods toward more authentic, process- and competency-oriented directions, such as project-based learning, classroom debates, and oral presentations.¹⁴ This happens to align with the future labor market’s demand for “soft skills” like critical thinking, communication, and creativity . Therefore, AI’s disruption of traditional assessment may have unexpectedly opened a door for the modernization of education.

Part 4: The Corporate Ecosystem: The Architects of AI Education

The booming K-12 AI education market is supported by a diverse, multi-layered corporate ecosystem. This ecosystem is composed of tech giants providing foundational platforms, specialized companies deeply cultivating vertical domains, vibrant startups, and non-profit organizations acting as the industry’s conscience. Together, from different dimensions, they are shaping the technological, product, and ethical boundaries of AI education.

Table 3: Overview of Major Players in the K-12 AI Education Market

Company/Organization Name	Category	Core Product/Service	Primary Market	Headquarters Region
Microsoft	Tech Giant	AI-enhanced Teams, Copilot, Immersive Reader	Global	North America
Google	Tech Giant	AI-integrated Google for Education Workspace	Global	North America
Squirrel AI	Specialized EdTech Company	AI adaptive tutoring platform, online-offline hybrid model	China, North America	Asia
Century Tech	Specialized EdTech Company	Personalized learning platform combining AI and neuroscience	UK, Global	Europe
Carnegie Learning	Specialized EdTech Company	MATHia (AI math tutoring platform), LiveLab	North America	North America
Merlyn Mind	Startup	Voice-activated AI assistant for teachers	North America	North America
Brisk Teaching	Startup	AI teaching assistant integrated into tools like Google Docs	Global	North America
everyone.AI	Non-profit Organization	AI ethics advocacy for children, policy research, international coalition	Global	North America
AI Education Project (aiEDU)	Non-profit Organization	AI literacy curriculum development and teacher professional development	North America	North America

4.1 The Incumbent Giants: Big Tech’s Play in Education

Large technology companies, with their strong technological accumulation, capital advantages, and massive user bases, play the role of “infrastructure providers” in the AI education field. Their strategy is not to build independent educational products from scratch, but to seamlessly integrate AI capabilities into their existing ecosystems that have already been widely adopted by schools.

• Microsoft: Through its Microsoft Education suite, Microsoft deeply integrates AI into core products like Teams and OneNote . Its AI features are mainly reflected in: Copilot smart assistant helping teachers with lesson planning and content generation; tools like Immersive Reader enhancing learning accessibility through text-to-speech and real-time translation, serving students with diverse needs; and backend analytics tools providing teachers with data insights on student engagement and performance to assist in teaching decisions .

• Google: Through its Google for Education platform, Google injects AI capabilities into its Workspace suite (e.g., Docs, Slides, Classroom).¹ Its advantage lies in its huge user base and cloud infrastructure, enabling it to provide stable and scalable AI services to schools.

• IBM: IBM competes in the market through its Watson Education division, leveraging its long-term accumulation in cognitive computing to provide solutions for the education sector.¹

The commonality among these giants is that they provide platform-level support for AI education, with their products often being comprehensive and focused on improving collaboration efficiency and management convenience.

4.2 Specialized Players: A Deep Dive into Leading EdTech Firms

Unlike tech giants, a group of specialized EdTech companies has chosen to focus on vertical domains, dedicated to solving specific teaching pain points. Their products often have a greater pedagogical depth.

• Case Study: Squirrel AI (China)

  • Business Model: As a leading unicorn in China’s AI education sector, Squirrel AI has pioneered a unique hybrid model that combines an online AI platform with offline physical learning centers.³⁰ It has over 3,000 learning centers worldwide, combining advanced technology with personalized tutoring from real teachers, primarily serving the K-12 after-school tutoring market.³¹

  • Core Technology: Its technological core is the Large Adaptive Model (LAM), trained on learning data from over 24 million students and 10 billion learning behaviors.³³ Its
    Intelligent Adaptive Learning System (IALS) can break down knowledge points to a “nano-level,” for example, splitting middle school mathematics into over 10,000 fine-grained knowledge points, to diagnose students’ knowledge weaknesses with extreme precision and provide targeted learning.³³

  • Market and Expansion: Squirrel AI offers tutoring courses in multiple subjects including math, Chinese, English, physics, and chemistry in the Chinese market.³⁴ In recent years, it has begun to expand into the international market. Its North American company operates independently, licensing its core technology, and currently offers math tutoring for PreK-5 in the United States, with plans to open its first learning centers in California and New York.³²

• Case Study: Century Tech (UK)

  • Business Model: This is an award-winning UK company whose platform uniquely integrates knowledge from three major fields: artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and pedagogy.⁷ It primarily provides services directly to schools and school districts through a SaaS model.

  • Core Technology: The platform builds a dynamic learning profile for each student by tracking every click, score, and interaction during the learning process.⁷ Its AI algorithm can quickly identify knowledge gaps, recommend personalized learning paths for students, and provide immediate, constructive feedback.³⁶

  • Value Proposition: A key selling point of Century Tech is its ability to significantly reduce teachers’ workload. By automating grading, data analysis, and progress reporting, the platform claims to save teachers up to six hours per week, allowing them to conduct more effective teaching interventions.⁷ Its course content is closely aligned with the UK national curriculum, covering core subjects like English, math, and science.³⁶

• Case Study: Carnegie Learning (USA)

  • Business Model: As a leading provider of K-12 education solutions in the US, Carnegie Learning has deep expertise in areas such as mathematics, literacy, and world languages.¹

  • Core Technology: Its flagship AI product is MATHia, a math learning platform designed for middle and high school students. The platform uses AI and cognitive science to simulate one-on-one human tutoring, providing students with personalized guidance and instant feedback . The accompanying LiveLab feature allows teachers to monitor the learning progress of the entire class in real-time, promptly identifying students who need help.

4.3 The Vanguard: Innovators and Startups

Beyond the giants and specialized companies, a large number of startups are filling market gaps with their flexibility and innovation, showcasing the broad prospects of AI education applications.

• Merlyn Mind: Developed a voice-activated AI assistant specifically for teachers. Teachers can control various tech devices in the classroom (like presentations and digital resources) through voice commands, thus not interrupting the teaching flow and significantly reducing the stress and distraction caused by technology operation.³⁷

• Brisk Teaching: This is a Chrome browser extension that embeds AI tools directly into the platforms teachers use daily (like Google Docs, YouTube). Teachers can generate lesson plans, quizzes, and rubrics with one click, or adjust the difficulty of reading materials, greatly improving work efficiency.³⁷

• Edexia: An AI-driven intelligent grading platform. Its uniqueness lies in its ability to simulate a teacher’s grading style by learning their grading habits, feedback style, and scoring preferences. It even supports the assessment of poetry, diagrams, and handwritten assignments, while ensuring the final grading authority remains with the teacher.³⁷

• Practically (India): This Indian startup focuses on providing immersive learning experiences, combining AI with augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies, allowing students to learn abstract concepts through interaction and practice.³⁰

4.4 The Industry’s Conscience: The Role of Non-Profit Organizations

Beyond commercial forces, a group of non-profit organizations is playing a crucial role as the “industry’s conscience” and supervisor. They are not for-profit but are dedicated to promoting the ethical, fair, and safe application of AI in education.

• everyone.AI: This US-based non-profit, founded by experts in AI and neuroscience, is unique in its approach of examining the impact of AI from the perspective of child cognitive development. The organization actively advocates for prioritizing child safety and well-being from the very beginning of AI product design.³⁸ One of its most important initiatives is launching an international coalition in partnership with the
  Paris Peace Forum, and in collaboration with UNICEF and UNESCO. The coalition includes 11 governments, such as France and Norway, as well as tech companies like Google and OpenAI, and over 20 non-governmental organizations, all aimed at jointly developing design guidelines for AI products for children.³⁸

• UNICEF: Through its “Generation AI” initiative and venture fund, UNICEF ensures that the development and application of AI systems are centered on children’s rights and funds startups that use AI to solve problems in education and health .

• AI Education Project (aiEDU): A US 501(c)(3) non-profit organization focused on developing high-quality AI literacy curricula for K-12 and providing related professional development training for teachers, committed to bridging the AI education resource gap .

• AI4ALL: Dedicated to increasing diversity and inclusion in the AI field, AI4ALL cultivates the next generation of diverse AI talent by providing educational programs for high school students from underrepresented groups .

By analyzing this complex corporate ecosystem, we can observe the formation of a three-layer market structure. The first layer is the platform layer, composed of tech giants like Microsoft and Google, which provide the underlying ecosystem and infrastructure. The second layer is the solution layer, consisting of specialized companies like Squirrel AI and Century Tech, which offer deep, professional teaching tools in specific domains. The third layer is the governance and ethics layer, made up of non-profit organizations like everyone.AI, which act as non-commercial supervisory forces, pushing the industry toward a more responsible direction. These three layers interact, collectively determining the future direction of the market.

Furthermore, the business models of Eastern and Western markets show clear divergence. Chinese companies, represented by Squirrel AI, have successfully combined online AI technology with a vast network of offline physical tutoring centers. This is a heavy-asset, service-heavy hybrid model that deeply fits the huge demand for after-school tutoring in the Asian market.³⁰ In contrast, Western EdTech companies generally adopt a light-asset Software as a Service (SaaS) model, with school districts or schools as their main customers, earning revenue by selling software licenses.³⁶ This difference in models is rooted in different market environments and cultural backgrounds. In the future, as Chinese companies go global, the collision and fusion of these two models will be a major point of interest in the market.

Part 5: Overcoming the Hurdles: Key Challenges to Equity and Effective Implementation

Despite the vast potential of K-12 AI education and the strong push from capital and policy, the path to its ideal implementation is fraught with severe challenges. If these challenges are not properly addressed, AI will not only fail to deliver on its promise to transform education but could also become a tool that exacerbates social inequality. Among these, the lag in teacher training, the widening equity gap, and the absence of a governance framework are the three most prominent obstacles.

5.1 The Human Bottleneck: The Crisis in Teacher Training and Professional Development

Technology can iterate rapidly, but enhancing human capabilities requires time and sustained investment. Currently, the biggest bottleneck in the AI education field is not the technology itself, but the people who use it—the teachers.

• The Grim State of Training: The widespread lack of AI proficiency among teachers is the core issue hindering the effective integration of AI into the classroom. Recent survey data paints a worrying picture. One study shows that even nearly two years after the launch of tools like ChatGPT, almost 58% of K-12 teachers have never received any training on artificial intelligence . Although the proportion of trained teachers is slowly increasing—the percentage of districts offering AI training rose from 23% in fall 2023 to 48% in fall 2024—more than half of the teaching force remains “untrained”.³⁹ More importantly, even when districts offer training opportunities, they are often
  non-mandatory, with limited participation.⁴⁰

• A Deficiency at the Source: This problem exists right from the source of teacher preparation—teacher education colleges. Research has found that the vast majority of teacher preparation programs are severely lagging behind technological developments. Only about a quarter of teacher education institutions have incorporated innovative teaching methods using AI into their curriculum.²⁹ Most faculty at these institutions are not interested in AI, or even hold resistant attitudes, with only 10% of faculty members reporting confidence in using AI.²⁹ When teacher education colleges do offer AI-related instruction, the content is mostly limited to how to use tools to
  detect student plagiarism, rather than how to use AI for innovative instructional design. This “cheating prevention” focus fundamentally limits future teachers’ imagination of AI’s potential.²⁹

• Direct Consequences: The severe lack of teacher training directly leads to the superficial and inefficient application of AI in the classroom. Many teachers are hesitant to adopt AI due to a lack of knowledge and guidance . Even when they do use AI, it is mostly for administrative support tasks like lesson planning or writing emails, rather than being deeply integrated into the teaching process. This situation means that the advanced AI education platforms that schools purchase at great expense may end up as costly, underutilized ornaments.

5.2 The Equity Gap: Is AI a Bridge or a Widener?

In theory, AI technology has enormous potential to promote educational equity by providing personalized tutoring to help disadvantaged students catch up. However, the reality may be heading in the opposite direction.

• The Widening Digital Divide: A large body of evidence indicates that there is a huge and growing gap in the adoption and application of AI between school districts of different socioeconomic backgrounds. Well-resourced, suburban, low-poverty, and majority-white school districts are far ahead of urban, rural, and high-poverty districts in terms of AI tool procurement and teacher training.⁴¹

• Alarming Data: Data shows that in the fall of 2024, the proportion of low-poverty districts providing AI training for teachers was as high as 67%, while this figure was only 39% for high-poverty districts.⁴⁰ Researchers predict that even if the total number of districts providing training increases in the future, this gap will be difficult to close in the short term.⁴⁰

• The Root of the Problem: The root of this inequality lies in the long-standing uneven distribution of educational resources. High-poverty districts often face more pressing survival and operational pressures (such as dealing with student absenteeism and providing basic meals), and lack the extra funds, technical talent, and energy to explore and implement emerging technologies like AI .

• Profound Impact: The danger of this trend is that it is creating a vicious cycle. Well-resourced districts improve teaching efficiency and effectiveness through AI, cultivating more competitive students, thereby attracting more quality resources and further widening the gap with other districts. Meanwhile, the students who most need AI technology for personalized support and to bridge educational gaps are the least likely to have access to these tools. AI, the much-hoped-for “great equalizer” in education, is in reality sliding into the abyss of becoming an “inequality amplifier” .

5.3 The Governance Deficit: Navigating Data Privacy, Security, and Algorithmic Bias

While AI technology is being rapidly introduced into K-12 classrooms, the corresponding regulatory, standards, and ethical frameworks are severely lacking, creating a huge governance deficit.

• A “Wild West” Regulatory Environment: Particularly in the United States, due to the lack of unified federal guidance, states and school districts are left to their own devices in the application of AI, exploring on their own.¹⁷ There is no consensus or unified standard on key issues such as how to define plagiarism, how to protect student data, and how to evaluate the effectiveness of AI tools. The market is filled with unverified claims and unknown risks.¹⁷

• Data Privacy and Cybersecurity: The operation of AI systems relies on massive amounts of personal student data, which raises serious privacy concerns.⁴ This data includes students’ learning records, behavioral patterns, and even emotional states. Once leaked or misused, the consequences could be dire. At the same time, K-12 schools are becoming major targets for cyberattacks, with incidents like ransomware attacks increasing exponentially.⁴² How to strictly comply with regulations like the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) while utilizing data is a huge challenge for all schools and EdTech companies.³⁷

• The Risk of Algorithmic Bias: AI is not inherently neutral. If the data used to train AI models contains societal biases (e.g., gender, racial, or social class biases), the AI system will learn, replicate, and even amplify these biases.²⁴ When AI is used to recommend career paths to students, assess their potential, or provide mental health advice, this bias can have a profound and unfair impact on students’ futures, especially harming already vulnerable groups.²⁴

• The Need for Auditing and Transparency: To address the above risks, it is crucial to establish an independent, authoritative auditing ecosystem for AI educational tools. There is a need for institutions like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to take the lead in developing evaluation standards and testing guidelines for K-12 AI tools in terms of accuracy, fairness, privacy protection, and security.¹⁷ When purchasing AI products, schools should require them to pass such third-party audits to ensure their safety and reliability.

In conclusion, the lack of teacher training constitutes the core execution risk for the entire AI education industry. No matter how advanced the technology, if the end-users—the teachers—are unable or unwilling to use it effectively, all investments will be wasted, and the market could fall into a “trough of disillusionment” after a brief period of prosperity. The exacerbation of the equity gap, on the other hand, fundamentally challenges the legitimacy and social value of AI education. These two issues are intertwined and together form the biggest obstacles that AI education must overcome on its path from ideal to reality.

Part 6: The New Frontier: Future Trajectories, Workforce Impact, and Strategic Recommendations

K-12 artificial intelligence education is not only reshaping today’s classrooms but is also profoundly influencing the future labor market and the fabric of society. Looking ahead, its development trajectory will exhibit two major trends: a deep integration with future job skills and an accelerated convergence with immersive technologies like the metaverse. Understanding these trends and formulating forward-looking strategies based on them is crucial for all stakeholders.

6.1 Preparing the Future Workforce: Beyond the Coder

The demands for talent in the AI era are undergoing a fundamental change. The core mission of K-12 AI education is not simply to train the next generation of programmers or data scientists, but to equip all students with the foundational literacy and core competencies necessary to survive and thrive in an AI-driven society.

• A Transforming Labor Market: Experts widely believe that AI and automation technologies will replace a large number of routine, repetitive jobs performed by humans, while also creating entirely new job positions . In this transformation, the skills least likely to be automated are precisely those unique, higher-order cognitive and social abilities of humans, often referred to as “21st-century skills,” including critical thinking, complex problem-solving, creativity, and communication and collaboration .

• The Dual Goals of AI Education: Therefore, K-12 AI education must aim for a dual objective to cultivate an “AI-ready workforce”.⁴³

  • Technical Fluency: Students need to master the basic knowledge of AI, understanding its working principles, capabilities, and limitations. This does not require everyone to become an AI expert, but to have the basic ability to interact meaningfully with AI systems, just as we require students to have digital literacy today .

  • Human-Centric Skills: More importantly, the focus of education should be on how to use AI as a tool to enhance and amplify human creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration skills . The future work model will be human-machine collaboration, and the key to success will be whether humans can ask valuable questions, make insightful judgments, and combine AI’s computational power with human wisdom.

• Creating New Professions: Through early and widespread AI education, students can be prepared for entirely new hybrid professions that may emerge in the future, such as an AI Ethicist, who needs both technical understanding and humanistic care, or a Machine Learning Auditor, responsible for supervising and evaluating the fairness of algorithms.²⁶

From this perspective, the ultimate goal of K-12 AI education presents a profound “paradox”: its most important task is to teach students what AI cannot do. It is precisely because AI can handle an increasing number of analytical and computational tasks that human empathy, creative intuition, and ethical judgment have become more valuable than ever. Therefore, high-quality AI education is, in essence, a reinforcement of humanistic education, not its replacement. It is not only a part of STEM education but also an indispensable core component of modern liberal arts education.

6.2 Beyond the Screen: The Convergence of AI and the Metaverse in Education

If current AI education is still largely confined to on-screen interactions, its next frontier will be a deep integration with immersive technologies such as the Metaverse, Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR). This will completely break the constraints of physical space and create unprecedented learning experiences .

• The Vision for Future Education: AI will become the “brain” or “operating system” of the educational metaverse. It will not only be able to create highly personalized learning content and paths for each student in the virtual world but also generate intelligent virtual teachers, study partners, and NPCs (Non-Player Characters), building a dynamic and interactive learning environment .

• Application Scenarios for Immersive Learning:

  • Virtual Labs and Simulation Training: Students can conduct high-risk or otherwise impractical scientific experiments in a completely safe virtual environment, such as simulating chemical explosions, exploring outer space, or performing virtual dissections.²⁵

  • Experiential Learning: VR and AR technology can allow students to “travel” to the streets of ancient Rome for history lessons or “dive” inside the human body to observe the workings of cells, transforming abstract knowledge into concrete, tangible experiences, thereby greatly enhancing learning interest and memory retention.⁴⁵

• Current Challenges: Despite the enticing prospects, the integration of AI and the metaverse is still in a very nascent stage. Its development faces numerous practical obstacles, the main ones being high costs and complex technical requirements.⁴⁴ Expensive VR/AR headsets, the need for high-bandwidth networks, and the lack of professional content all pose significant barriers to popularization.

This high barrier also signals a severe risk: the educational metaverse is very likely to become the next “rich man’s game” that exacerbates educational inequality. As we have already observed in the current popularization of AI tools, well-resourced school districts are already far ahead. It is foreseeable that for the more costly and technologically complex metaverse education, this “rich-get-richer” pattern will be repeated, and even intensified. While children from wealthy families engage in experiential learning in immersive virtual worlds, children in impoverished areas may not even have access to basic digital devices. This will create not just a knowledge gap, but a fundamental chasm in learning experiences and cognitive styles.

6.3 Strategic Recommendations and Concluding Analysis

Based on the comprehensive analysis of this report, to promote the development of global K-12 AI education in a more effective, equitable, and secure direction, the following strategic recommendations are proposed to the core stakeholders:

• For Policymakers:

  1. Urgently Address the Teacher Crisis: Teacher AI training must be elevated from an optional, fragmented project to a systematic, mandatory national strategy. Special funds should be invested to provide high-quality, continuous professional development programs for all in-service teachers and teacher candidates.

  2. Place Equity at the Core: Special funds and support mechanisms should be established to precisely help high-poverty and under-resourced school districts bridge the AI application gap. When evaluating and promoting AI education projects, “whether it promotes equity” must be the primary criterion.

  3. Accelerate the Establishment of Governance Standards: National-level audit standards and certification systems for K-12 AI education tools regarding data security, algorithmic bias, privacy protection, and teaching effectiveness should be developed as soon as possible in collaboration with professional bodies like NIST, to provide authoritative guidance for school procurement.

• For Investors:

  1. Conduct Prudent Evaluation, Beyond the Hype: Recognize the market’s volatility and uncertainty. Due diligence should go beyond superficial technical claims to deeply investigate whether a project has a proven pedagogical model that solves real educational problems (such as reducing teacher burden).

  2. Invest in the “Shovel Sellers”: Teacher training is the biggest market bottleneck at present. Therefore, companies that can provide scalable, high-quality teacher professional development solutions have huge investment potential.

  3. Pay High Attention to Execution Risk: The most advanced technology is worthless if it cannot be successfully implemented in a real school environment. When evaluating investment targets, focus should be on their teacher guidance, customer support, and integration capabilities with existing school workflows.

• For EdTech Leaders:

  1. Design with a Teacher-Centric Approach: Products must be intuitive, easy to use, seamlessly integrate into teachers’ daily work, and genuinely reduce their burden. Always remember that teachers are the ultimate users and promoters of the technology.

  2. Embrace Transparency and Explainability: Proactively and clearly explain to users how their algorithms work, the data they use, and their limitations. Actively seek independent third-party audits for algorithmic bias and security to build market trust.

  3. Collaborate with Non-Profit Organizations: Establishing partnerships with ethical advocacy organizations like everyone.AI not only helps to enhance the product’s social responsibility image but also provides valuable external perspectives to ensure product development is on the right track.

Concluding Analysis: The global K-12 artificial intelligence education industry is at a crossroads that will determine its future. Its development trajectory will no longer be solely determined by the speed of technological innovation, but more by how society as a whole responds to the three fundamental humanistic challenges of teacher capacity, equity, and governance. This is a complex game involving technology, capital, policy, and educational philosophy. Ultimately, the countries, regions, and companies that can successfully combine technological potential with human development needs, and adhere to the bottom line of fairness and ethics while pursuing efficiency, will not only define the future of education but also gain a head start in the competition to shape the future global labor market.

Cited works

1. What could an executive order on AI in education mean for schools? | K-12 Dive, https://www.k12dive.com/news/ai-education-executive-order-draft-oet/746171/

2. How Policy Can Help Ensure the Proper Use of AI in K-12 Education - mit raise, https://raise.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/AI-K-12_final-V2.pdf

3. AI in Education - Statistics and Trends (2025) - Boterview, https://boterview.com/a/ai-education-statistics

4. Artificial Intelligence and Education - The Council of Europe, https://www.coe.int/en/web/education/artificial-intelligence

5. AI in Education: The Current Landscape in 2025 - Mastery Coding, https://www.masterycoding.com/blog/landscape-of-ai-in-education

6. Artificial Intelligence in the Education Sector Market Top Companies …, https://www.emergenresearch.com/blog/top-10-leading-companies-in-the-artificial-intelligence-in-education-sector-market

7. Exploring artificial intelligence with young people | European School Education Platform, https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/en/discover/publications/exploring-artificial-intelligence-young-people

8. China Ai In Education Market Size & Outlook, 2024-2030, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/ai-in-education-market/china

9. AI Trends in Ed Tech to Watch in 2025 - EdTech Magazine, https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2025/01/ai-trends-ed-tech-watch-2025

10. China Mandates AI Education Nationwide by 2025, with Beijing …, https://theaitrack.com/china-mandates-ai-education/

11. K-12 in Ai in education market outlook - Grand View Research, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/statistics/ai-in-education-market/end-use/k-12-education/global

12. AI Teaching Tools: The Complete Guide to AI in K-12 Education - GoReact, https://get.goreact.com/resources/the-complete-guide-to-ai-in-k-12-education/

13. Non-profits to donate to : r/DefendingAIArt - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/DefendingAIArt/comments/1gl0tc9/nonprofits_to_donate_to/

14. AI in Education Market Size & Growth by 2030 - The School House Anywhere, https://www.tshanywhere.org/post/ai-education-market-size-growth-2030

15. The Future of Education: Exploring AI, STEM, Metaverse, AR, and VR - ColorWhistle, https://colorwhistle.com/future-of-education/

16. AI in Education: Comparing China and U.S. Strategies (K-12 and Beyond) - The Future of Being Human, https://futureofbeinghuman.com/api/v1/file/2737ea4a-2ca4-4cb5-85cb-4c9ad88f6204.pdf

17. Squirrel AI: Home, https://squirrelai.com/

18. 人工智能赋能教育革新：青少年AI创新实践指南发布 - 金融- 中国江苏网, https://economy.jschina.com.cn/rddt/202507/t20250701_3566312.shtml

19. Artificial Intelligence in K-12, Higher Education, and the Workplace, https://learnworkecosystemlibrary.com/topics/artificial-intelligence-in-education-k-12-higher-education-and-the-workplace/

20. K-12 AI curricula: a mapping of government-endorsed AI curricula - UNESCO Digital Library, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380602

21. New Survey Says U.S. Teachers Colleges Lag on AI Training. Here are 4 Takeaways, https://www.the74million.org/article/new-survey-says-u-s-teachers-colleges-lag-on-ai-training-here-are-4-takeaways/

22. Squirrel AI | Education World Forum 2025, https://www.theewf.org/page/4958314/squirrel-ai

23. Top AI Education Companies in 2025 | Leading EdTech Firms, https://aisuperior.com/ai-education-company/

24. China EdTech Market Size, Growth Report 2035, https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/china-edtech-market-46223

25. 6.3 | CENTURY Tech | LEAP for PIT, https://sites.psu.edu/leapforpit/artificial-intelligence/century-tech/

26. CENTURY | Reviews 2025: Features, Price, Alternatives, https://edtechimpact.com/products/century-tech-app/

27. Teacher AI training remains uneven despite uptick - K-12 Dive, https://www.k12dive.com/news/teacher-ai-training-remains-uneven-despite-uptick/745668/

28. FAQs - Squirrel AI, https://squirrelai.com/faqs/

29. Everyone.AI: Advocating for a Beneficial AI for Children - MerciSF, https://mercisf.com/2025/03/12/everyone-ai-advocating-for-a-beneficial-ai-for-children/

30. Majority of K-12 Teachers Still Lack AI Training, Survey Finds - MGT.AI, https://www.mgt.ai/insights/majority-of-k-12-teachers-still-lack-ai-training-survey-finds/

31. CENTURY Tech - Overview | Teachers & Educators Solver - MIT Solve, https://aws.solve.mit.edu/challenges/teachers-and-educators/solutions/4826/application

32. IDC Releases Report on AI-Powered Adaptive Education Industry, Revealing Opportunities and Future Trends of AI in Education - PR Newswire, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/idc-releases-report-on-ai-powered-adaptive-education-industry-revealing-opportunities-and-future-trends-of-ai-in-education-302496656.html

33. 正式发布！《中小学人工智能通识教育指南（2025年版）》来了, https://www.edu.cn/xxh/focus/zc/202505/t20250513_2667990.shtml

34. 13 AI Education Startups Transforming Teaching and Learning - Causeartist, https://www.causeartist.com/ai-education-startups/

35. China mandates eight hours of AI teaching from grade one; US executive order offers incentives instead - R&D World, https://www.rdworldonline.com/china-mandates-eight-hours-of-ai-teaching-from-grade-one-us-executive-order-offers-incentives-instead/

36. Squirrel AI - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squirrel_AI

37. 基础教育创新驱动力报告（2024） - CoSN, https://www.cosn.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024-DK12i-Hurdles-Accelerators-Tech-Enablers-Report%EF%BC%88CN%EF%BC%89.pdf

38. Policy Recommendation AI in education - Europe on Track, https://www.europeontrack.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Policy-Recommendation-AI-in-education-PAPER-2-1.pdf

39. Top 50 NGOs Leveraging AI to Drive Social Impact and Address Global Challenges, https://www.omdena.com/blog/top-ngos-leveraging-ai-to-drive-social-impact-and-address-global-challenges

40. Exploring the Future of Education: Integrating Metaverse and AI Tools to Enhance Learning Experiences - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389530260_Exploring_the_Future_of_Education_Integrating_Metaverse_and_AI_Tools_to_Enhance_Learning_Experiences

41. AI Education: The Foundation Of Tomorrow’s Workforce - Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2025/04/08/ai-education-the-foundation-of-tomorrows-workforce/

42. Preparing Students for AI - MOST Policy Initiative, https://mostpolicyinitiative.org/science-note/preparing-students-for-ai/

43. AI is coming to U.S. classrooms, but who will benefit?, https://crpe.org/ai-is-coming-to-u-s-classrooms-but-who-will-benefit/

44. OECD and European Commission Unveil Draft AI Literacy … - BABL AI, https://babl.ai/oecd-and-european-commission-unveil-draft-ai-literacy-framework-for-schools/

45. More Districts Are Training Teachers on Artificial Intelligence - RAND, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA956-31.html