Deep Research
Deep Research

June 30, 2025

What is the best AI for math?

An Analytical Report on the AI for Mathematics Landscape: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Tools, Technologies, and Trends

The Evolving Landscape of Mathematical AI

The market for artificial intelligence in mathematics is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by the convergence and competition between two distinct technological paradigms. Understanding the fundamental differences between deterministic computational engines and probabilistic large language models (LLMs) is essential for navigating this complex ecosystem. The evolution of these technologies, particularly their integration into hybrid systems, reveals a broader architectural shift in the AI industry, moving away from monolithic models toward more capable and reliable multi-tool agents.

The Two Paradigms: Computational Engines vs. Generative AI

The current landscape is defined by a schism between systems that compute and systems that generate.

Computational Engines (Deterministic Systems)

Computational engines represent the classical approach to machine-assisted mathematics. These systems, epitomized by platforms like Wolfram Alpha and the software engines behind Maple and Mathematica, operate on a vast, meticulously curated knowledge base of mathematical data, rules, and algorithms.¹ They are deterministic, meaning they do not guess or predict; they compute answers through formal logic and established procedures.³ When prompted, these engines perform dynamic computations rather than searching the web for existing answers.¹

The primary strength of this paradigm is its unparalleled accuracy and reliability. Outputs are consistent, verifiable, and grounded in mathematical truth. These systems excel at high-precision calculations, advanced data analysis, statistical operations, and creating complex visualizations.⁵ However, their historical weakness lies in their user interface. Many users find them “clumsy” or difficult to use, often requiring knowledge of a specific syntax to formulate queries correctly.⁵ They have traditionally been less adept at interpreting ambiguous, natural language requests or solving multi-step word problems that demand contextual understanding rather than pure calculation.⁹

Generative AI (Probabilistic Systems - LLMs)

Generative AI, powered by large language models such as OpenAI’s GPT series and Google’s Gemini, represents a fundamentally different approach. These probabilistic systems are trained on immense datasets of text and code to predict the next most likely word or token in a sequence.¹⁰ They do not possess a genuine, internal model of mathematical logic; instead, they are masters of pattern recognition, capable of mimicking the structure, language, and steps of a mathematical solution with remarkable fluency.¹²

Their key strength is their intuitive, conversational interface. They can engage in natural language dialogue, break down complex concepts in various ways, and function as an interactive, on-demand tutor.¹¹ This makes them highly effective for answering conceptual questions, brainstorming approaches to problems, and even assisting with the generation of code to solve mathematical tasks.¹⁰

However, their probabilistic nature is also their greatest weakness in a domain that demands precision. LLMs are notoriously prone to “hallucinations”—generating answers that are plausible-sounding but factually incorrect, and delivering them with unwavering confidence.¹⁷ They are unreliable with basic arithmetic and exhibit fragility in multi-step reasoning, where a single error in an early step can corrupt the entire solution without being detected.¹² Because they generate responses based on probability, they can provide different answers to the exact same question at different times, undermining their trustworthiness.¹³

The Rise of Hybrid Systems and Tool-Using Agents

The inherent limitations of each paradigm have created a powerful market incentive for hybridization. The unreliability of pure LLMs for precise calculation creates a demand for the accuracy of computational engines. Conversely, the often-unwieldy user experience of computational engines creates a demand for the conversational ease of LLMs. This has led to the emergence of hybrid systems, which represent a significant architectural evolution.

This development is not merely about combining two products; it signifies a move toward a new model of AI where a generalist LLM acts as an “orchestrator” or a natural language front-end that intelligently delegates tasks to a suite of more reliable, specialized back-end tools. This structure acknowledges the core weaknesses of LLMs and leverages their strengths as interfaces rather than as calculators. This trend suggests the future of AI is not a single, all-powerful model but a sophisticated ecosystem of interconnected, specialized agents. Consequently, the question of the “best AI for math” is shifting from a choice between individual tools to an evaluation of the most effective stack of integrated technologies.

Several implementation models for these hybrid systems have become prevalent:

  • Plugin/API Integration: This model allows an LLM to call upon an external tool. The most prominent example is the Wolfram Alpha plugin for ChatGPT, which enables the LLM to offload complex calculations to Wolfram’s computational engine, receive the accurate result, and then present it back to the user within a conversational explanation.¹¹

  • Code-Generation Backends: A growing number of new AI math tools, such as Julius AI and Mathos AI, operate on this principle. They use an LLM to interpret a user’s query (often a word problem) and translate it into executable code in a language like Python, utilizing robust mathematical libraries like SymPy for the actual computation.²² This leverages the LLM’s natural language and reasoning capabilities while grounding the final answer in a deterministic, verifiable programming environment, significantly reducing the risk of arithmetic hallucinations.²⁴

  • Proprietary Integrated Models: Companies are also developing specialized models that are fine-tuned extensively on mathematical data and reasoning processes. Tools like MathGPT and Math AI claim to have built more robust, native mathematical capabilities directly into their models, aiming to provide both conversational help and high accuracy without relying on external plugins.²⁵

AI Math Tools for Learning and Education (K-12 & Undergraduate)

The market for educational AI math tools is bifurcating, reflecting a broader tension in the EdTech industry. One branch consists of direct-to-consumer applications designed to provide students with immediate homework assistance. The other comprises tools built for educators and institutions, focusing on augmenting classroom instruction and saving teacher time. This divergence stems from the different needs and challenges of students and teachers. While students seek quick, understandable solutions, educators grapple with how to leverage these tools to foster genuine learning without enabling academic dishonesty. This has led to a new class of AI assistants designed to empower the human teacher rather than bypass them, suggesting the most sustainable future for AI in education lies in augmenting, not replacing, traditional instruction.

The Homework Helpers: Instant Solvers and Tutors

This is the most crowded and competitive segment of the market, primarily targeting students from K-12 to the undergraduate level. The core value proposition is the delivery of not just final answers but clear, step-by-step solutions that facilitate learning.

  • Photomath: Now owned by Google, Photomath is a market leader renowned for its superior camera-based input, which uses optical character recognition (OCR) to accurately scan both printed and handwritten problems.¹ Its defining feature, and a significant competitive advantage over rivals like Mathway, is that it provides comprehensive, step-by-step explanations for free.²⁸ The app is designed to explain the “what, why, and how” behind a solution, making it a highly recommended tool for students.¹ While the core functionality is free, a premium plan (around $9.99/month or $69.99/year) offers animated tutorials and deeper visual aids.¹

  • Mathway: Acquired by the education technology company Chegg, Mathway boasts an exceptionally broad scope, covering topics from basic arithmetic to advanced calculus, statistics, linear algebra, and even chemistry and physics.¹ However, its business model presents a significant drawback for learners: while it provides final answers for free, the crucial step-by-step explanations are locked behind a premium subscription, which costs approximately $9.99 per month or $39.99 per year.¹ This makes its free offering less effective as a learning tool compared to Photomath. Furthermore, it has been shown to struggle with problems that require interpreting diagrams.²⁸

  • Symbolab: Owned by Course Hero, Symbolab is praised for its powerful solving engine and its pedagogical focus on helping users understand the process of reaching a solution.⁹ It offers a clean interface and a suite of learning tools, including thousands of practice problems, customizable quizzes, and an interactive “Chat with Symbo” feature for clarifying confusing steps.⁹ It is a highly versatile tool covering a wide range of subjects from algebra through calculus and physics.¹ Like its competitors, it operates on a freemium model where advanced features and unlimited access to steps require a Pro subscription.⁶

  • Socratic by Google: Socratic is a free, multi-subject learning app that functions less like a direct solver and more like a highly curated educational search engine.²⁸ When a student inputs a problem (via photo, voice, or text), Socratic uses Google’s AI to find and present the best available online resources, such as detailed explanations, relevant videos, and Q&A forums.³⁰ It excels with introductory subjects like Algebra 1 but often struggles with higher-level math, where it may simply redirect users to other websites.²⁸ Its primary strength is its versatility across many school subjects and its ability to provide diverse learning materials to suit different learning styles.³⁸

  • The New Guard (LLM-Native Tutors): A new wave of applications has emerged, built from the ground up with LLMs and often employing code-generation backends for improved accuracy. Tools like Julius AI, Mathos AI (MathGPTPro), and MathGPT market themselves as superior alternatives to both older solvers and general-purpose chatbots. They make bold accuracy claims, such as Julius being “31% more accurate than GPT-4o” and Mathos being “20% more accurate than GPT-4”.²³ They differentiate themselves by offering a wider array of input methods—including text, photo, voice, drawing, and even PDF uploads—and by providing a more interactive, personalized tutoring experience that adapts to a student’s learning style.²⁵

The following table provides a comparative analysis of these leading AI math solvers.

Tool Core Technology Key Features Mathematical Scope Step-by-Step Explanations Pricing Model Unique Selling Proposition
Photomath ¹ Advanced OCR, Expert-Verified Methods Excellent photo scan (handwritten/printed), graphing, smart calculator Elementary Math, Algebra, Geometry, Trig, Statistics, Calculus High-quality and detailed; Free for basic explanations Freemium (Plus plan for visual aids: ~$9.99/mo) Industry leader in camera-based input with comprehensive free step-by-step solutions.
Mathway ¹ Computational Engine (Chegg) Photo/typed input, graphing, broad subject coverage Basic Math to Linear Algebra, Chemistry, Physics Paid. Free version only provides final answers. Freemium (Premium for steps: ~$9.99/mo) Extremely wide range of subjects covered, extending beyond traditional math.
Symbolab AI Computational Engine Photo/typed input, practice problems, quizzes, interactive chat Pre-Algebra, Algebra, Calculus, Trig, Geometry, Physics, Statistics High-quality; Paid for full access to all steps and features. Freemium (Pro subscription required for full access) Focuses on pedagogy and understanding the “journey” to the solution with interactive learning tools.
Socratic ²⁸ Google AI Search & Curation Photo/voice/typed input, finds videos and web explanations All school subjects; strongest in basic math (e.g., Algebra 1) Varies by source; finds free explanations from across the web. Free A multi-subject homework assistant that curates the best learning resources from the web.
Julius AI ²³ LLM + Code Generation Backend Photo/typed/chat input, word problems, data analysis, graphing Algebra, Geometry, Trig, Calculus, Statistics Detailed, AI-generated textual explanations; Free with limits. Freemium (Paid plans for more usage/features: from ~$20/mo) Claims superior accuracy over GPT-4o and other solvers; positions as a data analysis tool as well.
Mathos AI ²⁵ LLM + Code Generation Backend Photo/typed/voice/drawing/PDF input, personalized tutoring Basic Algebra, Geometry, Advanced Calculus, Scientific Notation Detailed, interactive explanations; Free with limits. Freemium (Pricing not specified) Claims superior accuracy over GPT-4; emphasizes multiple input formats and a personalized AI tutor experience.
Microsoft Math Solver ¹ Microsoft AI Photo/typed/handwriting input, graphing, practice worksheets Pre-Algebra, Algebra, Trig, Calculus, Statistics High-quality and detailed; Free. Free A robust and completely free tool from a major tech company with comprehensive features.

The Interactive Explorers: Visualization and Conceptual Understanding

Distinct from tools designed to simply provide answers, this category focuses on fostering conceptual understanding through interactive exploration and visualization.

  • Desmos: Primarily known as a best-in-class online graphing calculator, Desmos is built for discovery-based learning.¹ Its most lauded feature is the use of interactive sliders, which allow users to dynamically change variables in an equation and instantly see the effect on the graph. This builds a powerful and intuitive understanding of concepts like function transformations.¹ The platform is completely free, works offline, and is widely integrated into classroom learning management systems, making it a favorite among both students and educators.¹

  • GeoGebra: This free and powerful tool creates a dynamic link between different mathematical fields, seamlessly combining geometry, algebra, calculus, and statistics.¹ Its core strength is its ability to visually connect algebraic expressions with their geometric counterparts, allowing students to explore these relationships in an interactive environment that supports inquiry-based learning.¹

The Classroom Revolution: AI for Educators

A new category of AI tools has emerged that is designed not for the student, but for the teacher. These platforms aim to alleviate administrative burdens, save time, and enable educators to create more personalized and effective learning environments.¹⁷

  • Brisk Teaching: This AI-powered Chrome extension is a versatile assistant for math teachers. It can instantly generate comprehensive lesson plans, create engaging, standards-aligned word problems tailored to any theme, and even produce quizzes from existing resources like YouTube videos.⁵⁰ Educators praise it for saving them hours of content creation time.⁵⁰

  • SchoolAI: This platform focuses on providing students with one-on-one AI tutors while giving teachers a powerful administrative dashboard. This dashboard allows educators to monitor student progress in real-time, quickly identify learning gaps, and provide targeted support.³⁶ It integrates directly with common classroom tools like Canvas and Google Classroom.³⁶

  • Khanmigo: The AI tutor from Khan Academy is designed to guide students through problems without simply giving away the answer, promoting critical thinking.⁵ For teachers, Khanmigo can analyze student performance data and provide recommendations for how to group students for targeted instruction—a task that can take hours to do manually.⁴⁹ However, reports have indicated that the tool can sometimes struggle with basic computation, requiring teacher verification.¹⁸

  • SALT-Math: Representing a more experimental pedagogical approach, this University of Florida research project flips the traditional learning model. It uses AI to simulate a fictional student, and the real student’s task is to teach this AI agent how to solve algebra problems, thereby deepening their own understanding through the act of teaching.⁵¹

AI for Advanced and Professional Mathematics

Beyond the K-12 and undergraduate classroom, AI is an indispensable tool for professionals in science, engineering, and finance. In this domain, the focus shifts from learning basic concepts to performing high-precision computation, modeling, and simulation. Furthermore, a new frontier is opening in pure mathematics, where AI is beginning to function not just as a calculator but as a creative partner in research and discovery. This reveals a significant gap between the mature, product-driven “AI for Education” market and the nascent, research-driven “AI for Research” field. The former is defined by competition over user experience and subscription models, while the latter is shaped by academic collaboration and government funding. Over time, the advanced capabilities developed in the research domain are likely to be productized, transforming the educational tools of the future.

The Computational Powerhouses: Beyond the Calculator

For professionals, mathematical software must be robust, reliable, and powerful. The following tools are industry standards for tasks that demand computational certainty.

  • Wolfram Alpha / Mathematica: Wolfram Alpha is far more than a simple solver; it is a “computational knowledge engine” used extensively by professionals for its precision and encyclopedic scope.¹ Its backend, powered by Mathematica, contains over 50,000 algorithms and can perform a vast range of complex calculations, statistical analyses, and data visualizations.⁵ It is a tool for generating deep, data-driven reports, not just answers.⁵ Recent developments, including a natural language interface via Wolfram GPT, are making its power more accessible.⁵ The platform uses a freemium model; the free version has limits on computation time and step-by-step solutions, while Pro plans (starting around $5–$8.25 per month) unlock full capabilities.⁷

  • Maple: A direct competitor to the Wolfram ecosystem, Maple is an all-in-one software environment used by engineers and scientists for sophisticated modeling, simulation, and algorithm development.¹ It combines one of the world’s most powerful math engines with a technical document interface that allows users to seamlessly integrate calculations, text, and visualizations.⁵⁴ Maplesoft offers a range of products, from the free
    Maple Calculator app for students to the professional-grade Maple and Maple Flow software, which carry enterprise-level pricing, with annual subscriptions costing over $1,500.⁵⁴

  • SageMath: This is a powerful, open-source alternative to commercial products like Mathematica and Maple. It integrates a wide array of existing mathematical libraries into a unified Python-based interface, making it a viable and cost-effective option for researchers and engineers who require high-level computational and modeling capabilities.⁵⁶

The New Frontier: AI in Mathematical Research

The most profound shift in AI for mathematics is its emerging role as a collaborator in pure research. This moves beyond using computers for calculation and toward using them for ideation, pattern recognition, and proof assistance.

Leading mathematicians like Fields Medalist Terence Tao have described this new paradigm as having an AI “co-pilot”.² The vision is not for AI to replace human creativity but to augment it by automating tedious calculations, verifying logical steps, and exploring vast solution spaces that are beyond human capacity.⁵⁸ This human-AI collaboration could allow mathematicians to focus on high-level strategy and conceptual breakthroughs, potentially enabling them to “mass produce” theorems.²

This potential has attracted significant institutional investment. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) launched the Exponentiating Mathematics (expMath) program, a major initiative to develop AI systems that can act as “co-authors” to mathematicians, with the goal of radically accelerating the pace of discovery in critical scientific and technological fields.⁶⁰

The role of AI in this new frontier is multifaceted, as summarized in the table below.

Role in Research Description of AI Application Key AI Capabilities Expert Commentary
Proof Development & Verification ⁶² AI systems help translate informal, human-readable mathematical arguments into rigorously formal, machine-verifiable proofs using proof assistants like Lean. Natural Language Processing, Formal Logic, Pattern Matching “If I were to write a math paper, I would explain the proof to a proof assistant… and they would help formalize it.” - Terence Tao ⁶²
Experimental Mathematics ⁶² AI can rapidly test millions or billions of potential mathematical statements (lemmas or conjectures) to find patterns, identify counterexamples, and gather empirical evidence. High-Throughput Computation, Pattern Recognition, Brute-Force Search “Your computer becomes the test tube and you sort of stick the problem in the test tube and shake it around and see what comes out.” - Timothy Gowers ⁶²
Automated Conjecture Generation ⁶² By analyzing vast quantities of mathematical literature across disparate fields, AI can identify novel connections and propose new, plausible conjectures that a human specialist might overlook. Large-Scale Data Mining, Cross-Domain Pattern Recognition, Information Synthesis “This is a thing I think [large language models] would be really, really good at.” - Geordie Williamson ⁶²
Lowering Barriers to Entry ⁶² AI assistants can provide accurate, intuitive explanations of complex terminology and core concepts in specialized fields, reducing the years of background study needed for mathematicians to contribute to new areas. Natural Language Explanation, Knowledge Retrieval, Concept Summarization AI could make the “barrier to entry to fields become a lot lower.” - Geordie Williamson ⁶²

Evaluating Performance and Trustworthiness

A critical analysis of AI math tools reveals a significant gap between the marketing claims of consumer-facing products and the measured performance documented by the scientific community. While many applications are promoted as highly accurate solvers, formal benchmarks and academic studies highlight persistent and fundamental limitations in AI’s ability to reason mathematically. This discrepancy underscores the absolute necessity of human skepticism and verification when using these tools, as their confident delivery of incorrect information poses a tangible risk, especially in educational settings. The most crucial skill for a user of AI math tools is not prompt engineering, but the ability to critically evaluate and independently verify the output.

The Challenge of Benchmarking: Measuring Mathematical Reasoning

To move beyond marketing hype and assess the true capabilities of AI models, the research community relies on standardized benchmarks. These tests provide objective, comparable data on how different models perform on specific mathematical tasks.

  • MATH (Math Word Problem Solving): A widely used benchmark consisting of challenging problems from high school math competitions. The current leaderboard is dominated by frontier models like Google’s Gemini 2.0, Alibaba’s Qwen2.5, and OpenAI’s GPT-4, which achieve high scores often by using sophisticated techniques like generating code to solve the problem rather than relying on pure text-based reasoning.⁶⁴

  • MathVista: This benchmark is specifically designed to test mathematical reasoning in visual contexts, such as interpreting graphs, charts, and geometric diagrams.⁶⁵ In a significant milestone, recent results show that top models like Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-4o have now surpassed the average performance of human annotators on this benchmark, demonstrating strong progress in multimodal reasoning.⁶⁵

  • FrontierMath: Developed by Epoch AI in collaboration with over 70 mathematicians, this benchmark represents the current pinnacle of difficulty. It consists of unpublished, research-level problems that would take human experts hours or days to solve.⁶⁶ The results are telling: while leading AI models achieve near-perfect scores on older, simpler benchmarks, they solve fewer than 2% of the problems in FrontierMath.⁶⁶ This highlights the vast chasm that still exists between current AI capabilities and true expert-level mathematical reasoning. OpenAI’s undisclosed funding of this benchmark and its models’ early access to the problems have raised concerns about transparency in the research community.⁶⁸

The following table summarizes the performance of leading AI models on these key benchmarks.

Benchmark Description Top Performing Model (as of late 2024) Top Score Human Baseline
MATH ⁶⁴ 12,500 challenging high school competition math problems. Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental 89.7% Accuracy Not directly comparable
MathVista ⁶⁵ 1,000 problems requiring math reasoning in visual contexts. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) 63.9% Accuracy 60.3% Accuracy
AIME ²⁴ American Invitational Mathematics Examination; high-difficulty competition math. o3-mini-high 50.0% Accuracy Top human competitors score much higher
FrontierMath ⁶⁶ 300 unpublished, expert-level research problems. OpenAI o3 25.2% Accuracy (on an early version) Expert mathematicians
GSM8K ⁶⁷ Grade school math word problems. GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 ~97% Accuracy 92% Accuracy

The “Hallucination” Problem: Why AI Gets Math Wrong

The reason even the most advanced AI models fail on complex math problems is rooted in their fundamental architecture. LLMs are probabilistic text predictors, not logical reasoners.¹¹ They generate solutions by guessing the most statistically likely sequence of words, not by understanding the underlying mathematical principles. This leads to several common and well-documented failure modes:

  • Arithmetic Errors: Models frequently make basic calculation mistakes that a simple calculator would not.¹⁰

  • Fragile Multi-Step Reasoning: LLMs struggle to maintain a coherent chain of thought. An error made in an early step is rarely caught or corrected, leading to a cascade of failures that invalidates the entire solution.¹³

  • Inconsistent Reasoning: Due to their probabilistic nature, models can produce different answers and even different solution methods when given the exact same prompt multiple times.¹³

  • Sensitivity to Irrelevant Information: Studies show that adding superfluous information to a word problem causes a significant drop in performance. This indicates the models rely on shallow pattern matching rather than true logical deduction to identify the relevant components of a problem.¹⁴

  • Lack of Backward Reasoning: Humans often solve complex problems by working backward from a desired conclusion. LLMs, which generate text in a forward, left-to-right sequence, are fundamentally poor at this type of goal-driven thinking, which is essential for many mathematical proofs.¹³

Academic research confirms these flaws. Studies have found that even a state-of-the-art model like ChatGPT-4 can have error rates between 25% and 47% on standard algebra problems—equivalent to a D or F grade.¹⁹ While techniques such as “self-consistency” (running the same prompt multiple times and choosing the most frequent answer) can reduce these error rates, they do not eliminate them, especially in more nuanced fields like statistics.¹⁹

The Human in the Loop: The Imperative of Verification

The tendency for AI to produce confidently incorrect answers is particularly dangerous for learners, who often lack the expertise to identify the errors.¹⁵ This can lead to students memorizing flawed problem-solving methods or becoming overly reliant on the technology, using it as a “crutch” that ultimately hinders their learning and can lead to worse outcomes than for students without AI access.¹²

Given that AI systems lack true comprehension, contextual understanding, and ethical judgment, robust human oversight is non-negotiable.⁷² Humans must be responsible for defining goals, establishing boundaries, verifying outputs, and holding systems accountable for their errors.⁷² This is especially critical in high-stakes applications where incorrect outputs could have serious consequences.⁷²

In the context of advanced mathematical research, this oversight is being formalized. There is a growing movement to pair the output of LLMs with formal verification systems (also known as proof assistants) like Lean, Coq, and Isabelle.² These are software tools grounded in mathematical logic that can check a proof for correctness with absolute certainty. The process of “autoformalization”—using an LLM to translate a human-written proof into a format that a proof assistant can verify—represents the ultimate form of human-in-the-loop collaboration. It bridges the gap between an LLM’s plausible-sounding argument and a rigorously, mathematically verified result, ensuring the integrity of AI-assisted discovery.⁷⁵

Recommendations and Future Outlook

The “best” AI for math is not a single product but rather the tool or stack of tools that best aligns with a user’s specific context, needs, and expertise. The choice depends entirely on whether the user is a student trying to learn algebra, an educator designing a curriculum, an engineer modeling a complex system, or a researcher exploring the frontiers of knowledge. The future of the field points toward a deeper, more collaborative partnership between human intelligence and machine computation, where the critical skill will be leveraging AI’s power while exercising human skepticism and creativity.

A User-Centric Guide: Choosing Your “Best” AI

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the current market, the following recommendations are provided for different user profiles.

For the High School/College Student

  • Primary Need: Homework help, understanding concepts, and preparing for exams.

  • Top Recommendation: Photomath. Its combination of excellent photo-based input for handwritten problems and its delivery of high-quality, free step-by-step explanations makes it the most valuable all-around learning tool for most students.²⁸

  • Secondary Recommendations: Use Symbolab for its extensive practice problems and coverage of more advanced topics like calculus and physics.⁹ For interactive, conversational help with word problems, consider newer LLM-based tutors like
    Julius AI or Mathos AI, but with the critical caveat that their calculations must always be verified, either manually or with a trusted calculator.¹⁵ For building visual intuition about functions and graphs,
    Desmos is an unparalleled and free resource.¹

For the Parent or Tutor

  • Primary Need: Assisting a student with homework and explaining concepts in a clear, understandable way.

  • Top Recommendation: Photomath. The app is invaluable for parents who may be unfamiliar with modern math curricula, as its detailed, expert-verified steps can effectively teach the solution method to both the parent and the child.¹

  • Secondary Recommendation: Socratic by Google. This tool is useful for finding supplementary learning materials, such as videos and articles, that can explain a difficult concept from multiple perspectives.³⁸

For the Math Educator

  • Primary Need: Saving time on administrative tasks, creating engaging curriculum materials, and personalizing instruction.

  • Top Recommendation: Brisk Teaching. This Chrome extension is a powerful productivity tool specifically designed for the teacher’s workflow, capable of generating lesson plans, themed word problems, and quizzes from existing resources in seconds.⁵⁰

  • Secondary Recommendations: GeoGebra and Desmos are best-in-class free tools for creating interactive in-class demonstrations that bring abstract concepts to life.¹
    Khanmigo shows promise for personalized tutoring and data-driven student grouping, but its outputs must be carefully vetted for accuracy.⁵

For the Engineer or Scientist (Professional Use)

  • Primary Need: High-precision computation, complex modeling, simulation, and data analysis.

  • Top Recommendation: Wolfram Alpha/Mathematica or Maple. These are the undisputed industry-standard computational software suites, designed for professional-grade reliability and power.⁵ The choice between them often comes down to specific industry conventions or user preference.

  • Secondary Recommendation: SageMath serves as a powerful, free, and open-source alternative for users who need advanced capabilities without the high cost of a commercial license.⁵⁶

For the Research Mathematician

  • Primary Need: Assisting in the discovery of new mathematical knowledge.

  • Recommendation: The “best tool” for this user is not a commercial app but direct engagement with the frontier of AI research. This involves exploring the use of formal proof assistants like Lean in conjunction with LLMs to accelerate proof formalization and verification.² Researchers should closely follow developments from leading AI labs like
    DeepMind and OpenAI and government-funded initiatives like DARPA’s expMath program.⁵⁹

The Road Ahead: The Future of Human-AI Mathematical Collaboration

The consensus among leading experts is that AI will not render human mathematicians obsolete; rather, it will evolve into an indispensable collaborative partner.²

In the near term (the next 1-3 years), the market will see more powerful and reliable hybrid systems that combine the conversational strengths of LLMs with the computational accuracy of dedicated engines. For researchers, the use of AI to automate the proof of smaller, more tedious components of a larger proof (lemmas) will become increasingly common, fundamentally altering the mathematical workflow.²

The long-term vision (5+ years) is to create AI that can contribute to novel and creative mathematical insights. This future involves a clear division of labor: AI will handle the “grunt work” of massive-scale computation, pattern detection, and logical verification, freeing humans to focus on high-level strategy, creative problem formulation, and conceptual breakthroughs.² The very practice of mathematics may become more experimental and collaborative, enabled by AI platforms that can test millions of hypotheses in an instant or allow hundreds of mathematicians worldwide to contribute to a single, formally verified proof.⁵⁷

Ultimately, the “best AI for math” is not a static product but an evolving partnership. The most critical skill in this new era will be the uniquely human ability to leverage AI’s immense computational power while exercising skepticism, creativity, and rigorous oversight to guide it toward correct, meaningful, and profound discoveries. This reality places a new and urgent demand on mathematics education: the focus must shift away from rote computation—a task that AI can perform flawlessly—and toward the cultivation of critical thinking, abstract problem-solving, and verification skills, which remain the exclusive and essential domain of the human mind.¹⁷

Cited works

  1. 10 Best AI for Math Problems - AutoGPT, https://autogpt.net/10-best-ai-for-math/

  2. New AI stuns mathematicians with its problem-solving skill - Math Scholar, https://mathscholar.org/2025/06/new-ai-stuns-mathematicians-with-its-problem-solving-skill/

  3. Symbolab vs. Wolfram Alpha Comparison - SourceForge, https://sourceforge.net/software/compare/Symbolab-vs-Wolfram-Alpha/

  4. WolframAlpha Review 2023: Details, Key Features & Price - FreeWithAI, https://freewithai.com/wolframalpha/

  5. AI Tools for Math Teachers | Top AI Tools for Mathematics Instruction - TOM DACCORD, https://www.tomdaccord.com/ai-tools-for-math-teachers

  6. 10 Top Tools for Math AI-WuKong Blog, https://www.wukongsch.com/blog/10-top-tools-for-math-ai-post-44400/

  7. I tested Wolfram Alpha AI for solving maths problems: My review for new users, https://techpoint.africa/guide/my-wolfram-alpha-review/

  8. Symbolab vs. Wolfram? (or any other CAS) : r/learnmath - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/gqs5gu/symbolab_vs_wolfram_or_any_other_cas/

  9. Symbolab – Trusted Online AI Math Solver & Smart Math Calculator, https://www.symbolab.com/

  10. Why is AI bad at maths? - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1jxs264/why_is_ai_bad_at_maths/

  11. Anyone using AI to solve math problems in class? : r/learnmath - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/1df3mbg/anyone_using_ai_to_solve_math_problems_in_class/

  12. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Information Literacy: Why AIs Are Bad at Math, https://libguides.westsoundacademy.org/artificial-intelligence-ai-and-information-literacy/why-ais-are-bad-at-math

  13. Why Large Language Models Struggle with Mathematical Reasoning? - Medium, https://medium.com/@adnanmasood/why-large-language-models-struggle-with-mathematical-reasoning-3dc8e9f964ae

  14. A Quick Summary Of Several Limitations In The Current Evaluations Of Llms’ Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities - Murat Durmus (CEO @AISOMA_AG), https://murat-durmus.medium.com/a-quick-summary-of-several-limitations-in-the-current-evaluations-of-llms-mathematical-reasoning-52b2eb357043

  15. Has anyone had much success with using AI math tutoring tools for exam prep? - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/18md69h/has_anyone_had_much_success_with_using_ai_math/

  16. What has your experience been solving math problems with AI? : r/learnmath - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/1feamj0/what_has_your_experience_been_solving_math/

  17. Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics Teaching, https://www.nctm.org/standards-and-positions/Position-Statements/Artificial-Intelligence-and-Mathematics-Teaching/

  18. AI Gets Math Wrong Sometimes. How Teachers Deal With Its Shortcomings, https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/ai-gets-math-wrong-sometimes-how-teachers-deal-with-its-shortcomings/2024/09

  19. Researchers combat AI hallucinations in math - The Hechinger Report, https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-combat-ai-hallucinations-math/

  20. The limits of AI in mathematics: What makes human special | Terence Tao and Lex Fridman, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjOzS7t1Vow

  21. Large Language Models and Mathematical Reasoning Failures - Hugging Face, https://huggingface.co/papers/2502.11574

  22. Top 4 AI Math Tools: A Comprehensive Guide - My Engineering Buddy, https://www.myengineeringbuddy.com/top-4-ai-math-tools-a-comprehensive-guide/

  23. AI Math Solver | Solve any problem with Julius, https://julius.ai/home/ai-math/

  24. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Benchmarking Methodology, https://artificialanalysis.ai/methodology/intelligence-benchmarking

  25. Mathos | AI Math Solver & Calculator, https://www.mathgptpro.com/

  26. Math AI Solver Free Online & AI Homework Helper, https://math-gpt.ai/

  27. Which Math Solver is Better: Photomath or Mathway? - Toolify.ai, https://www.toolify.ai/ai-news/which-math-solver-is-better-photomath-or-mathway-1104285

  28. The Ultimate Math App Showdown: Mathway vs Photomath vs Socratic - Toolify.ai, https://www.toolify.ai/ai-news/the-ultimate-math-app-showdown-mathway-vs-photomath-vs-socratic-1203616

  29. Photomath - The Ultimate Math Help App | Math Explained, https://photomath.com/

  30. Top 10 Math AI Tools, https://julius.ai/articles/top-10-math-ai-tools

  31. Mathway | Algebra Problem Solver, https://www.mathway.com/

  32. Mathway Reviewed- Pros, Cons, and Everything You Need to Know - Moonpreneur, https://mp.moonpreneur.com/math-corner/mathway-reviewed/

  33. Mathway: Math Problem Solver on the App Store - Apple, https://apps.apple.com/ca/app/mathway-math-problem-solver/id467329677

  34. 10 Best Symbolab Alternatives: Smarter Math Solvers - HIX Tutor, https://tutor.hix.ai/hub/symbolab-alternatives

  35. Choose the Best Math App: Mathway, Photomath, or Socratic? - Toolify.ai, https://www.toolify.ai/ai-news/choose-the-best-math-app-mathway-photomath-or-socratic-1212463

  36. The 10 best AI tools for math proficiency - SchoolAI, https://schoolai.com/blog/ai-for-math-transforming-learning-and-teaching-in-education

  37. Socratic app accessibility review - Perkins School For The Blind, https://www.perkins.org/resource/socratic-app-accessibility-review/

  38. Socratic by Google AI Reviews: Use Cases, Pricing & Alternatives - Futurepedia, https://www.futurepedia.io/tool/socratic-by-google

  39. Google Lens Announces New ‘Homework’ Filter, Solves Math Problems With Photo - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/i902qz/google_lens_announces_new_homework_filter_solves/

  40. 9 Best AI for Math Tools (June 2025) - Unite.AI, https://www.unite.ai/best-ai-for-math-tools/

  41. MathGPT - AI Math Solver - Math Solver & Homework Helper, https://math-gpt.org/

  42. Microsoft Math Solver - Math Problem Solver & Calculator, https://math.microsoft.com/

  43. Graphing Calculator - Desmos, https://www.desmos.com/calculator

  44. Desmos Graphing Calculator – Apps on Google Play, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details/Desmos_Graphing_Calculator?id=com.desmos.calculator&hl=en_NZ

  45. Desmos Online Graphing Calculator - EdisonOS, https://www.edisonos.com/digital-sat/desmos-graphing-calculator

  46. Desmos Graphing Calculator on the App Store - Apple, https://apps.apple.com/us/app/desmos-graphing-calculator/id653517540

  47. Top AI Math Apps: Free Tools to Master Mathematics | 2024 Guide, https://ctrinity.wordpress.com/2024/10/24/math-apps/

  48. GeoGebra - the world’s favorite, free math tools used by over 100 …, https://www.geogebra.org/

  49. The Future of Math Class: How AI Could Transform Instruction - Education Week, https://www.edweek.org/technology/the-future-of-math-class-how-ai-could-transform-instruction/2025/03

  50. Brisk AI Tools for Math teachers, https://www.briskteaching.com/subject/ai-tools-for-math-teachers

  51. AI-Powered Mathematics Education Project Funded by UF President’s Strategic Funding Initiative - Warren B. Nelms Institute – for the Connected World - University of Florida, https://iot.institute.ufl.edu/2024/01/salt-math/

  52. Wolfram Alpha Pricing and Packages For 2025 - Alternatives.Co, https://alternatives.co/software/wolfram-alpha/pricing/

  53. Maple - The Essential Tool for Mathematics - Maplesoft, https://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/index.aspx

  54. Professional Catalog - USD - Maplesoft Store, https://store.maplesoft.com/products/usd-maple-professional/

  55. Maple Calculator - AI Learning Tools, https://ai-learning-tools.com/maple-calculator/

  56. Top 7 AI Math Tools to Solve Complex Math Problems in June, 2025 - Powerdrill, https://powerdrill.ai/blog/top-ai-math-tools-to-solve-complex-math-problems

  57. 4 Ways How AI Is Changing Mathematics, https://julius.ai/articles/4-ways-how-ai-is-changing-mathematics

  58. Can AI speed up the pace of mathematical discovery? - MindStick, https://www.mindstick.com/blog/305791/can-ai-speed-up-the-pace-of-mathematical-discovery

  59. Mathematical Beauty, Truth and Proof in the Age of AI | Quanta Magazine, https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematical-beauty-truth-and-proof-in-the-age-of-ai-20250430/

  60. Math + AI = Tomorrow’s breakthroughs - DARPA, https://www.darpa.mil/news/2025/math-ai-tomorrows-breakthroughs

  61. Can AI Quicken the Pace of Math Discovery? - In the Media | Institute for Advanced Study, https://www.ias.edu/news/can-ai-quicken-pace-math-discovery

  62. AI and the future of Math: Interviews with Top Mathematicians, https://epoch.ai/frontiermath/expert-perspectives

  63. Use of AI - Math Research - LibGuides at Paradise Valley Community College, https://paradisevalley.libguides.com/mathresearch/AI

  64. MATH Benchmark (Math Word Problem Solving) - Papers With Code, https://paperswithcode.com/sota/math-word-problem-solving-on-math

  65. Most powerful AI outperform humans in math challenges!, https://www.aimathsolve.com/blogs/ai-outperform-humans

  66. FrontierMath: LLM Benchmark for Advanced AI Math Reasoning, https://epoch.ai/frontiermath

  67. FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AI, https://epoch.ai/frontiermath/the-benchmark

  68. OpenAI quietly funded independent math benchmark before setting record with o3, https://the-decoder.com/openai-quietly-funded-independent-math-benchmark-before-setting-record-with-o3/

  69. Examining the potential and pitfalls of AI in problem solving - Journal of Pedagogical Research, https://www.ijopr.com/article/examining-the-potential-and-pitfalls-of-ai-in-problem-solving-16112

  70. Artificial Intelligence: Positives and Negatives in the Mathematics Classroom - CIDDL, https://ciddl.org/artificial-intelligence-positives-and-negatives-in-the-mathematics-classroom/

  71. (PDF) EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF AI–POWERED TUTORS MATHGPT AND FLEXI 2.0 IN ENHANCING CALCULUS LEARNING - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385695329_EVALUATING_THE_IMPACT_OF_AI-POWERED_TUTORS_MATHGPT_AND_FLEXI_20_IN_ENHANCING_CALCULUS_LEARNING

  72. The crucial role of humans in AI oversight - Cornerstone OnDemand, https://www.cornerstoneondemand.com/resources/article/the-crucial-role-of-humans-in-ai-oversight/

  73. Where would the new reasoning AI leave human intelligence? | World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/in-a-world-of-reasoning-ai-where-does-that-leave-human-intelligence/

  74. The Ultimate Guide to Formal Verification, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-formal-verification

  75. Formal Reasoning Meets LLMs: Toward AI for Mathematics and Verification, https://simons.berkeley.edu/news/formal-reasoning-meets-llms-toward-ai-mathematics-verification

  76. AI Verifies Mathematical Proofs Step-by-Step, Improving Formal Verification Success., https://quantumzeitgeist.com/ai-verifies-mathematical-proofs-step-by-step-improving-formal-verification-success/

  77. Towards Provable AI: The Role of Formal Methods in Natural Language Understanding, https://ppujari.medium.com/towards-provable-ai-the-role-of-formal-methods-in-natural-language-understanding-92a9d93b30df

  78. Symbolab vs Photomath vs Wolfram : r/learnmath - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/lrw374/symbolab_vs_photomath_vs_wolfram/

  79. AI Program Plays the Long Game to Solve Decades-Old Math Problems - www.caltech.edu, https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/ai-program-plays-the-long-game-to-solve-decades-old-math-problems

Older > < Newer